Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Britz v. Kinsvater, 351 P.2d 986.
- In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to O.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to O.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to D.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to D.H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
as to Z.L., ¶ 19 (App. 2023) ().
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.J. and A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.J. and A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Dunlap v. Shinn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Dunlap v. Shinn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Z.L. 536 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Z.L. 536 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Marcos G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Marcos G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Ashley S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Ashley S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Ygnacio F. v. Dcs, M.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Ygnacio F. v. Dcs, M.E.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(explaining an appellant concedes the accuracy of the trial court’s findings when uncontested on appeal).
- Deandre F. v. Dcs, A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Deandre F. v. Dcs, A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Sarah P., Michael M. v. Dcs, V.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Sarah P., Michael M. v. Dcs, V.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Marianna R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Marianna R. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
see also Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -78, ¶¶ 5-6 (App. 2017) (“[W]e adhere to the policy that it is generally not our role to sua sponte address issues not raised by the appellant.”); Christina G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Tiffany W. v. Dcs, K.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Tiffany W. v. Dcs, K.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Monice C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Monice C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Shane D., Kassandra D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Shane D., Kassandra D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Cindy M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Cindy M. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
("Inasmuch as the trial court's findings of fact are not themselves challenged by this appeal, we may assume that their accuracy is conceded.").
- Derek S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Derek S. v. Dcs, J.B.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(a party’s failure to challenge factual findings concedes their accuracy).
- Amber H. v. Dcs, E Al. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Amber H. v. Dcs, E Al. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Jones v. Denning Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Jones v. Denning
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
("Inasmuch as the trial court's findings of fact are not themselves challenged by this appeal, we may assume that their accuracy is conceded.").
- Francisco v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Francisco v. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(finding that when the trial court’s findings are not challenged on appeal, we “may assume that their accuracy is conceded”).
- Alan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Alan C. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(by failing to challenge the accuracy of findings, a party concedes the accuracy on appeal); Crystal E., 241 Ariz. at 578, ¶ 6 (issues not raised in an opening brief are waived).
- Candelaria P. v. Dcs, C.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Candelaria P. v. Dcs, C.D.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(stating that, where a trial court’s finding of fact are unchallenged, “we may assume that their accuracy is conceded.”).
- Justin G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Justin G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017