Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hansen, 751 P.2d 951.

96 citing documents.

State v. Serrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Serrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Reuvers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Reuvers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State of Arizona v. Preston Alton Strong 555 P.3d 537 Ariz. 2024
State of Arizona v. Preston Alton Strong 555 P.3d 537 Ariz. 2024
State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
See State v. Williams , , 379-80, , 965-66 (App. 1991) (citing State v. Hansen , , 296-97, , 956-57 (1988) ).
State of Arizona v. Bryan Wayne Hulsey Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Bryan Wayne Hulsey Ariz. 2018
(“[W]e note that the trial court is in a better position to judge whether the prosecutor is unduly sarcastic, his tone of voice, facial expressions, and their effect on the jury, if any.”).
Sundstrom v. Flatt 418 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sundstrom v. Flatt 418 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Law P. 46(A) ("Any family law case or post-decree petition may be dismissed ....") (emphasis added); see also State v. Hansen , , 294, , 954 (1988) ( "[W]hether to grant a ...
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 37 (2000) (-97 (1988)).
State v. Birchett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Birchett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-95, -55 (1988) (holding that court did not abuse its discretion in denying Willits instruction when similar photographs to those missing were presented at trial); (stating “failure to pursue every lead or gather eve
State v. Hollingsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hollingsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bravo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bravo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Weiss 232 P.3d 1259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Weiss 232 P.3d 1259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State of Arizona v. Anthony Shariff Gay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Anthony Shariff Gay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Newell, 132 P.3d at 845; (“[T]he trial court is in a better position to judge whether [a] prosecutor is unduly sarcastic, his tone of voice, facial expressions, and their effect on the jury, if any.”).
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
State v. Newell 132 P.3d 833 Ariz. 2006
State v. Newell 132 P.3d 833 Ariz. 2006
State of Arizona v. Max Valencia Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Max Valencia Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
State v. Prince 61 P.3d 450 Ariz. 2003
State v. Prince 61 P.3d 450 Ariz. 2003
State of Arizona v. Alice C. Jeffrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Alice C. Jeffrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
She argues that the jury’s discovery 8 of a bullet that was the same caliber and brand as the bullets in Devine’s gun was “prejudicial” and “went to the heart of her defense.” The decision whether to grant a new trial is within the sound discretion of the trial court, P.2d 951 (1988), and we will not disturb its ruling absent an abuse of this discretion.
State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Blackman 38 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Blackman 38 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
turb a trial court’s ruling on such a motion unless we find a clear abuse of discretion, , and as we review such rulings we bear in mind that “the trial court is in the best position to determine whether an attorney’s remarks require a mistrial.” ¶ 37 , (-97 , -57 (1988)).
Keenen v. Biles 17 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Keenen v. Biles 17 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
State v. Jones 4 P.3d 345 Ariz. 2000
State v. Jones 4 P.3d 345 Ariz. 2000
-97 , -57 (1988) (citations omitted).
State v. Gilfillan 998 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Gilfillan 998 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Pecard 998 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Pecard 998 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999