Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite McClanahan v. Hawkins, 367 P.2d 196.
- Sysco Arizona, Inc. v. Hoskins 330 P.3d 354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Sysco Arizona, Inc. v. Hoskins
330 P.3d 354
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Bryan, 180 Ariz. at 369 , 884 P.2d at 255 (“To create a lien under the general judgment lien statute, a judgment ‘must be final and conclusive.’”), -42 , Ariz. Farmers, 24 Ariz.App.
- In Re the Marriage of Priessman 266 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
-
In Re the Marriage of Priessman
266 P.3d 362
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
(no power to modify decree as to past-due installments); -68, -53 (1976) (same).
- Bryan v. Nelson 884 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- Bryan v. Nelson 884 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- In Re the Marriage of Ramirez 840 P.2d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
- In Re the Marriage of Ramirez 840 P.2d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
- Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc. 700 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1985
- Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc. 700 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1985
- Teed v. Ridco Realty, Inc. 655 P.2d 798 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
-
Teed v. Ridco Realty, Inc.
655 P.2d 798
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
As to whether or not the prior recording of the decree of divorce which contained the provisions for child support created a lien on the Dicus property
- Rowe v. Schultz 642 P.2d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
-
Rowe v. Schultz
642 P.2d 881
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Judgments § 454, at 884 (1947); , Curtis Mfg.
- Cordova v. Lucero 629 P.2d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Cordova v. Lucero 629 P.2d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Ibach v. Ibach 600 P.2d 1370 Ariz. 1979
-
Ibach v. Ibach
600 P.2d 1370
Ariz. 1979
Baures v. Baures, 13 Ariz.App.
- Jarvis v. Jarvis 553 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Jarvis v. Jarvis
553 P.2d 1251
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Baures v. Baures, 13 Ariz.App.
- Walker v. Davies 550 P.2d 230 Ariz. 1976
- Walker v. Davies 550 P.2d 230 Ariz. 1976
- Hatch v. Hatch 547 P.2d 1044 Ariz. 1976
- Hatch v. Hatch 547 P.2d 1044 Ariz. 1976
- Stanley v. Stanley 535 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
-
Stanley v. Stanley
535 P.2d 629
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Baures v. Baures, 13 Ariz.App.
- Hatch v. Hatch 534 P.2d 295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Hatch v. Hatch 534 P.2d 295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Willoughby v. King 522 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- Willoughby v. King 522 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- Baures v. Baures 478 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
-
Baures v. Baures
478 P.2d 130
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Badertscher v. Badertscher, 10 Ariz.App.
- Johnson v. Johnson 462 P.2d 782 Ariz. 1969
- Johnson v. Johnson 462 P.2d 782 Ariz. 1969
- Johnson v. Johnson 455 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
-
Johnson v. Johnson
455 P.2d 463
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
58 A.L.R.2d 352 (1956); , , , 94 A.L.R.
- Porter v. Porter 416 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1966
- Porter v. Porter 416 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1966