Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stevens v. Mehagian's Home Furnishings, Inc., 365 P.2d 208.

112 citing documents.

Markiewicz v. SALT RIVER VALLEY, ETC. 576 P.2d 517 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
See Rule 54(b), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.; [12] Stevens v. Mehagian's Home Furnishings, Inc., , , But cf. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co., 465 Pa.
Engineers v. Sharpe 573 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1977
Engineers v. Sharpe 573 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1977
See Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc.
Terrazas v. SUPERIOR CT., CTY. OF MARICOPA, DIV. FIVE 543 P.2d 120 Ariz. 1975
Terrazas v. SUPERIOR CT., CTY. OF MARICOPA, DIV. FIVE 543 P.2d 120 Ariz. 1975
e but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment.” (Emphasis supplied) The purpose of Rule 54(b) is to provide a way for determining whether a judgment which would not otherwise appear to be final is final for appeal purposes, Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , and is to prevent piecemeal litigation where there *436 are multiple parties or multiple claims, E
United Farm Workers National Union v. Heggblade - Marguleas - Tenneco, Inc. 520 P.2d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
United Farm Workers National Union v. Heggblade - Marguleas - Tenneco, Inc. 520 P.2d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , Van Baalen v. Superior Court, 19 Ariz.App.
State v. Wimberg 514 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Wimberg 514 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
See also: , Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings Inc., , , Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz.App.
Arizona Bank v. SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF MARICOPA 495 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Arizona Bank v. SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF MARICOPA 495 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings Inc., , and Tarnoff v. Jones, 15 Ariz.App.
Tarnoff v. Jones 486 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Tarnoff v. Jones 486 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
See Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , Stevenson v. Celaya, 10 Ariz.App.
Reed v. Frey 458 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Reed v. Frey 458 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Additionally, this particular order did not dispose of all pending claims *295 and hence would appear to be an interlocutory order under Rule 54(b), as amended, 16 R.Civ.P., see Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , and, further, the order does not appear to have been put in appeal-able form.
Stevenson v. Celaya 457 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Stevenson v. Celaya 457 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
375 , 240 F.2d 406 (1956); Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc.
Boies v. Anderson 435 P.2d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Boies v. Anderson 435 P.2d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Stevens v. Mehagain’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , Searles v. Haldiman, 3 Ariz.App.
Haberkorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 427 P.2d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Haberkorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 427 P.2d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
412 , citing Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc.
Ulan v. Kay 427 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Ulan v. Kay 427 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc.
Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance Company 423 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance Company 423 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc.
J. H. Welsh & Son Contracting Co. v. Arizona State Tax Commission 420 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
J. H. Welsh & Son Contracting Co. v. Arizona State Tax Commission 420 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , , ; and Searles v. Haldiman, 3 Ariz.App.
Bulova Watch Co. v. Super City Department Stores of Arizona, Inc. 422 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Bulova Watch Co. v. Super City Department Stores of Arizona, Inc. 422 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc.
Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of Insurance 422 P.2d 108 Ariz. 1966
Mozes v. Daru 420 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Mozes v. Daru 420 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
The Supreme Court of Arizona has passed upon the requirement of such a finding in Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc.
Rail N Ranch Corporation v. State 419 P.2d 742 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Rail N Ranch Corporation v. State 419 P.2d 742 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
As stated by the Supreme Court of Arizona in Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , a “multiple claims” action: “In accordance with the language of the rule it is clear that a trial court’s judgment on one or more, but less than all of the claims asserted in a multiple claims *302 action is not final, and hence, not appeal-able, where the court does not make the ‘determination’
City of Tucson v. Wondergem 419 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
City of Tucson v. Wondergem 419 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
However, the Supreme Court of Arizona has heretofore indicated in Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , the procedure we will follow in this jurisdiction.
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris 419 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris 419 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings Inc., , , Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz.App.
Pegler v. Sullivan 418 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Pegler v. Sullivan 418 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Miles v. City of Chandler, 297 F.2d 690 (9th Cir. 1961) ; Richardson v. United States, 336 F.2d 265 (9th Cir. 1964) ; Norte and Co. v. Defiance Industries, Inc., 319 F.2d 336 (2d Cir. 1963) ; Rinker v. Local Union No. 24 of Amalgamated Lithographers, 313 F.2d 956 (3d Cir. 1963); Cf. Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc.
Flynn v. Johnson 414 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Flynn v. Johnson 414 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
In Meloy as in Stevens v. Mehagians Home Furnishing, Inc., , the Arizona Supreme Court on its own motion undertook to examine into its jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Searles v. Haldiman 413 P.2d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Searles v. Haldiman 413 P.2d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz.App.
Tipton v. Industrial Commission 409 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Tipton v. Industrial Commission 409 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings
Ginn v. Superior Court, in and for County of Pima 404 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Ginn v. Superior Court, in and for County of Pima 404 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , , 188 P. 875 (1920).
Christian v. Cotten 403 P.2d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Christian v. Cotten 403 P.2d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , [1961]; , [1963].

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by