Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Rueda v. Galvez, 382 P.2d 239.
- Short v. Dewald 244 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Short v. Dewald 244 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Garza v. Swift Transportation Co. 213 P.3d 1008 Ariz. 2009
-
Garza v. Swift Transportation Co.
213 P.3d 1008
Ariz. 2009
§ 12- 2101(B) to appeals ‘from a final judgment.’”
- Mezey v. Fioramonti 65 P.3d 980 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- Boydston v. Strole Development Co. 962 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
Boydston v. Strole Development Co.
962 P.2d 209
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(even if the parties do not raise the issue, the court must determine whether it has jurisdiction); Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Adver., Inc., , (a corporation cannot appear in court by an officer who is not an attorney and cannot appear
- Sullivan & Brugnatelli Advertising Co. v. Century Capital Corp. 734 P.2d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Sullivan & Brugnatelli Advertising Co. v. Century Capital Corp.
734 P.2d 1034
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
the same court held that an order setting aside an entry of default is not a special order made after final judgment and is therefore not appeal-able.
- Anonymous Wife v. Anonymous Husband 739 P.2d 791 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Anonymous Wife v. Anonymous Husband 739 P.2d 791 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Northeast Phoenix Homeowners' Ass'n v. Scottsdale Municipal Airport 636 P.2d 1269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Northeast Phoenix Homeowners' Ass'n v. Scottsdale Municipal Airport 636 P.2d 1269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D. 636 P.2d 89 Ariz. 1981
- Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D. 636 P.2d 89 Ariz. 1981
- Marshall v. Williams 627 P.2d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Marshall v. Williams 627 P.2d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M.D. 636 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Vital v. Johnson 624 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Vital v. Johnson 624 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M.D.
636 P.2d 104
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Matter of Appeal In Maricopa County, Juvenile Action Nos. J-86384 and JS-2605
-
Soltes v. Jarzynka
621 P.2d 933
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., , (Oct.
- Pulaski v. Perkins 619 P.2d 488 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Pulaski v. Perkins 619 P.2d 488 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Actions Nos. J-86384 & JS-2605 594 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Actions Nos. J-86384 & JS-2605
594 P.2d 104
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
City of Tucson v. Wondergem, 4 Ariz.App.
- State v. Wimberg 514 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
-
State v. Wimberg
514 P.2d 1258
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
See also: , Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings Inc., , , Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz.App.
- American Motors Sales Corp. v. Superior Court 494 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
American Motors Sales Corp. v. Superior Court
494 P.2d 394
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Since an order denying a motion to set aside a default is not appealable, , intervention by way of special action is appropriate.
- Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County 443 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
-
Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County
443 P.2d 443
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
See, e.g., Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Insurance, , , Searles v. Haldiman, 3 Ariz.App.
- McClintock v. Serv-Us Bakers 436 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1968
- McClintock v. Serv-Us Bakers 436 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1968
- Walter v. Northern Arizona Title Co. 433 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
Walter v. Northern Arizona Title Co.
433 P.2d 998
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
* * * ” And our Supreme Court has stated: “After a motion to set aside entry of default has been denied it remains for the trial court to conduct hearings, when appropriate, to determine the amount of damages or to establish the truth of any averment, and to enter judgment upon the default.” 133
- Sahlin v. AMERICAN CASUALTY CO. OF READING, PA. 423 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
- Sahlin v. AMERICAN CASUALTY CO. OF READING, PA. 423 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of Insurance 422 P.2d 108 Ariz. 1966
- Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris 419 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
-
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris
419 P.2d 735
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings Inc., , , Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz.App.
- Bolon v. Pennington 415 P.2d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
-
Bolon v. Pennington
415 P.2d 148
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
our Supreme Court held that an order denying a motion to set aside a default was not appealable.
- Searles v. Haldiman 413 P.2d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
-
Searles v. Haldiman
413 P.2d 860
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Therefore, the order is not appealable.” Rueda v. *295 Galvez, 133
- In Re Tribble 382 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1963