Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Yeazell v. Copins, 402 P.2d 541.

116 citing documents.

SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER ONE OF PIMA CO. v. Hastings 472 P.2d 44 Ariz. 1970
SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER ONE OF PIMA CO. v. Hastings 472 P.2d 44 Ariz. 1970
American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co., , , affirmed 355 U.S. 538 , 69 S.Ct.
Hall v. Keller 455 P.2d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Hall v. Keller 455 P.2d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. Superior Court of Pima County 436 P.2d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Superior Court of Pima County 436 P.2d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Fowler v. Dana 436 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Fowler v. Dana 436 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
City of Phoenix v. Boerger 427 P.2d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
City of Phoenix v. Boerger 427 P.2d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
The Police Act has many distinguishing features when compared with the Firemen’s Act and is important to our consideration in relation to certain legal principles enunciated by the Arizona Supreme Court on 3 June 1965, , .
Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co. 420 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co. 420 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Skaggs Drug Center, Inc. v. United States Time Corp. 420 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1966
Skaggs Drug Center, Inc. v. United States Time Corp. 420 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1966
American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co., , aff’d, 335 U.S. 538 , 69 S.Ct.
French v. Babb 419 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
French v. Babb 419 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by