Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Estate of Milliman, 415 P.2d 877.

91 citing documents.

Brady v. Tempe life/brady/mckee/hospice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Brady v. Tempe life/brady/mckee/hospice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
§ 12- 612(C) and In re Milliman’s Estate, ).
National Tax v. Sweeney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
National Tax v. Sweeney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Freightways, and ); Ariz. R. Civ.
Marc S. v. Robyn P./william P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Marc S. v. Robyn P./william P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See also In re Milliman’s Estate, (“The theory underlying the concept of a void judgment is that it is legally ineffective—a legal nullity; and may be vacated by the court which rendered it at any time.
Kimball v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kimball v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See In re Milliman’s Estate, see also Restatement (Second) of Agency § 272 (1958) (“[T]he liability of a principal is affected by the knowledge of an agent concerning a matter as to which he acts within his power to bind the principal or upon which it is his duty to give the principal information.”).
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
338 , , opinion vacated by
In Re Estate of Rodriguez 160 P.3d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re Estate of Rodriguez 160 P.3d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Ariz. Const, art. 20, para. 2; In re Milliman’s Estate
Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc. 128 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc. 128 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Wilmot v. Wilmot 58 P.3d 507 Ariz. 2002
Wilmot v. Wilmot 58 P.3d 507 Ariz. 2002
Id.; see also In re Millman’s Estate
Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers 942 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers 942 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Restatement (Second) of Agency § 275 (1958); see also Ulibarri, 178 Ariz. at 159 , 871 P.2d at 705 (A positive act to conceal a wrong will toll the Statute of Limitations.).
Martin v. Martin 893 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Martin v. Martin 893 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
There is no time limit in which a motion under Rule 60(c)(4) may be brought; the court must vacate a void judgment or order “even if the party seeking relief delayed unreasonably.” , accord In re Milliman’s Estate, , , *15 881 (1966).
Woodty v. Weston's Lamplighter Motels 859 P.2d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Woodty v. Weston's Lamplighter Motels 859 P.2d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Gomez v. Maricopa County 857 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Gomez v. Maricopa County 857 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In , the court observed that the surviving spouse, *472 acting as a statutory trustee for the other beneficiaries, may compromise a wrongful death claim without bringing suit.
Manley v. Ticor Title Insurance 816 P.2d 225 Ariz. 1991
Manley v. Ticor Title Insurance 816 P.2d 225 Ariz. 1991
Restatement (Second) of Agency §§ 272, 275 (1958) (hereafter Restatement)
Manley v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 798 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Manley v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 798 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Restatement (Second) of Agency, § 272 (1958).
Dickens v. First American Title Insurance 784 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Dickens v. First American Title Insurance 784 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
“Notice to the agent is notice to the principal.”
Brown Wholesale Electric Co. v. Beztak of Scottsdale, Inc. 774 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Brown Wholesale Electric Co. v. Beztak of Scottsdale, Inc. 774 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Sentry Insurance v. Superior Court 753 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Sentry Insurance v. Superior Court 753 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Katz v. Filandro 739 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Katz v. Filandro 739 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Schoenrock v. Cigna Health Plan of Arizona, Inc. 715 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Schoenrock v. Cigna Health Plan of Arizona, Inc. 715 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Arizona’s wrongful death statute is patterned after the original Lord Campbell’s Act of England 2 to “create a new cause of action for the benefit of the beneficiaries named in the statute.” Estate of Milliman
Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty. 698 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1985
Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty. 698 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1985
Mannel v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 688 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Mannel v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 688 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
4 Additionally, the widow’s interpretation is anomalous because the injured employee and his dependents may have simultaneous civil remedies: a survival action brought by the personal representative for the decedent’s estate, , Barragan v. Superior Court, 12 Ariz.App.
Wallace Imports, Inc. v. Howe 673 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Silver v. Rose 661 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Silver v. Rose 661 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
In re Milliman’s Estate, , City of Flagstaff v. Babbitt, 8 Ariz.App.
Bowslaugh v. Bowslaugh 617 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1979
Bowslaugh v. Bowslaugh 617 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1979
One is a claim for damages to the survivors; the other is for damages to the estate.’
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Hurt v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ. 601 P.2d 1329 Ariz. 1979