Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Phoenix v. Donofrio, 407 P.2d 91.

145 citing documents.

State v. Baca 926 P.2d 528 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(1965) (a court will not inflate, expand, stretch or extend a statute to matters not falling within its expressed provisions).
Arizona State Board of Regents v. Arizona State Personnel Board 953 P.2d 904 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Arizona State Board of Regents v. Arizona State Personnel Board 953 P.2d 904 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd.
Vanderheiden v. SUPERIOR COURT MARICOPA 897 P.2d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Vanderheiden v. SUPERIOR COURT MARICOPA 897 P.2d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(court will not read into a statute something not within legislative intent gathered from statute itself).
Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd. 840 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd. 840 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
City of Mesa v. Smith Co. of Arizona, Inc. 816 P.2d 939 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
City of Mesa v. Smith Co. of Arizona, Inc. 816 P.2d 939 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Moreover, “a municipality can only exercise the right of eminent domain when it is conferred upon it by the legislature expressly or by necessary implication.”
City of Tempe v. Fleming 815 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
City of Tempe v. Fleming 815 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
McIntyre Refrigeration, Inc. v. Mepco Electra 799 P.2d 901 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
McIntyre Refrigeration, Inc. v. Mepco Electra 799 P.2d 901 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
“[A] court will not inflate, expand, stretch or extend a statute to matters not falling within its expressed provisions.”
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Maricopa County 786 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Maricopa County 786 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Marriage of Hines v. Hines 707 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Marriage of Hines v. Hines 707 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Arizona Security Center, Inc. v. State 689 P.2d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arizona Security Center, Inc. v. State 689 P.2d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Moreover, “courts will not inflate, expand, stretch or extend a statute to matters not falling within its expressed provisions.”
Union Rock & Mat. v. Scottsdale Con. Center 678 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Union Rock & Mat. v. Scottsdale Con. Center 678 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Collins v. Stockwell 671 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1983
First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. Continental Bank 673 P.2d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Collins v. Stockwell 671 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1983
First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. Continental Bank 673 P.2d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Maricopa County 635 P.2d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Maricopa County 635 P.2d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
However, the “courts will not read into a statute something which is not within the manifest intention of the legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”
City of Yuma v. Lattie 572 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
City of Yuma v. Lattie 572 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
462 , 34 L.Ed.2d 314 (1972)
State v. Denny 569 P.2d 303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Denny 569 P.2d 303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Martin v. Althoff 557 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Martin v. Althoff 557 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
King v. Coulter 550 P.2d 623 Ariz. 1976
King v. Coulter 550 P.2d 623 Ariz. 1976
City of Phoenix v. McCullough 536 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
City of Phoenix v. McCullough 536 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
holds that off-street parking is not an authorized eminent domain purpose for the City of Phoenix.
Board of Trustees of Mary E. Dill School District No. 51 v. Board of Education of Sahuarita High … 506 P.2d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Board of Trustees of Mary E. Dill School District No. 51 v. Board of Education of Sahuarita High … 506 P.2d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Johnson v. Collins 464 P.2d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Johnson v. Collins 464 P.2d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
appeal dismissed 389 U.S. 1 , 88 S. Ct. 55 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1
Magma Flood Control District v. Palmer 418 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Magma Flood Control District v. Palmer 418 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
§ 45-1264 (Emphasis added) , and argues that because the purported delegation of power contained in A.R.S.
Rutledge v. State 412 P.2d 467 Ariz. 1966
Rutledge v. State 412 P.2d 467 Ariz. 1966
Although nearly all the eminent domain statutes in this state were adopted from California ( , ), this court has repeatedly held that Article II, Sec.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by