Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima, 412 P.2d 463.

108 citing documents.

Friedman v. Juvenile Court, Division of the Superior Court 509 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
McDaniel v. McDaniel, 64 Wash.2d 273
In Re Adoption of Baby Boy 472 P.2d 64 Ariz. 1970
Natural Mother v. Adopting Parents 472 P.2d 64 Ariz. 1970
Natural Mother v. Adopting Parents 472 P.2d 64 Ariz. 1970
The natural mother was represented by counsel, , .
In Re Adoption of Baby Boy 472 P.2d 64 Ariz. 1970
The natural mother was represented by counsel, , .
State Ex Rel. Ariz. St. Bd. of P. & P. v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 467 P.2d 917 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State Ex Rel. Ariz. St. Bd. of P. & P. v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 467 P.2d 917 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
“It is a remedy within the sound discretion of the court to which application is made.” at 172 , at 466 (1966)
Morrison v. Superior Court of Coconino County 461 P.2d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Morrison v. Superior Court of Coconino County 461 P.2d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Jones v. Lopez Plascencia 458 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Jones v. Lopez Plascencia 458 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Caruso v. Superior Court, In and For Pima County, , paraphasing Abelleira v. District Court, 17 Cal.2d 280 , , 132 A.L.R.
Anonymous v. Superior Court in & for the County of Pima 457 P.2d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Anonymous v. Superior Court in & for the County of Pima 457 P.2d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
In Re Adoption of Baby Boy 455 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Natural Mother v. Adopting Parents 455 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
In Re Adoption of Baby Boy 455 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
the court said in reference to juvenile court proceedings: "We will recognize petitioner's right to his child until his unfitness clearly appears or until it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the child is dependent, *51 neglected, incorrigible, or delinquent."
Natural Mother v. Adopting Parents 455 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Every intendment should be in favor of the claim of the parent upon the evidence, and where the statute is open to construction and interpretation, it should be construed in support of the right of the natural parent.” , the court said in reference to juvenile court proceedings:.
Gamet v. Glenn 455 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1969
Gamet v. Glenn 455 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1969
For example, in Genda v. Superior Court, Pima County, , , the Court of Appeals, Division Two, had denied applications for extraordinary writs and we reviewed the matter on petitions for review.
Martin v. Superior Court in and for Co. of Maricopa 451 P.2d 597 Ariz. 1969
Martin v. Superior Court in and for Co. of Maricopa 451 P.2d 597 Ariz. 1969
Ronan v. Superior Court, etc., , ; , .
In Re Estate of Thelen 450 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
In Re Estate of Thelen 450 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Steffen v. Bunker 448 P.2d 82 Ariz. 1968
In Re Adoption of Krueger 448 P.2d 82 Ariz. 1968
In Re Adoption of Krueger 448 P.2d 82 Ariz. 1968
Pazos v. Superior Court 448 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Pazos v. Superior Court 448 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court 446 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1968
Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court 446 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1968
Spettigue v. Mahoney 445 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Spettigue v. Mahoney 445 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima, , and see
Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County 443 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County 443 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
: “It is clear that the propriety of granting the writ depends upon the facts of each case.
Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima 439 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1968
Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima 439 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1968
Foster v. Brooks 438 P.2d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Foster v. Brooks 438 P.2d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Agraan v. Superior Court in and for Pima County, 4 Ariz.App.
City of Phoenix Ex Rel. Backstein v. Superior Court 432 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
City of Phoenix Ex Rel. Backstein v. Superior Court 432 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Anguis v. Superior Court 429 P.2d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Anguis v. Superior Court 429 P.2d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Erdman v. Superior Court 429 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Erdman v. Superior Court 429 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
McRae v. Forren 428 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
McRae v. Forren 428 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Miller v. Superior Court, etc., , (certiorari) ; Caruso v. Superior Court, etc., , (prohibition-dictum).
Dotseth v. Justice Court, Tucson, Precinct No. One 427 P.2d 558 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Dotseth v. Justice Court, Tucson, Precinct No. One 427 P.2d 558 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Phelps v. Superior Court 424 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Phelps v. Superior Court 424 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967