Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima, 412 P.2d 463.
- Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 423 P.2d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
-
Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima
423 P.2d 375
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
The Supreme Court of Arizona has recently indicated that the scope of writs of prohibition may be broad enough to encompass correction of errors committed by inferior tribunals, pointing out that “acts in excess of jurisdiction * * * ” include “* * * acts where the lower tribunal has abused its discretion.”
- Charboneau v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 422 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1967
- Charboneau v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 422 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1967
- Agraan v. Superior Court 418 P.2d 161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- Agraan v. Superior Court 418 P.2d 161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- Taylor v. Stanford 414 P.2d 727 Ariz. 1966
-
Taylor v. Stanford
414 P.2d 727
Ariz. 1966
465 , we said: “ * * * a writ of prohibition is proper to prevent an inferior tribunal from acting without ór in excess of its jurisdiction which may result in wrong, damage and injustice and there is no plain, speedy and adequate remedy otherwise available.” There is no doubt the Superior Court h