Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Camacho v. Gardner, 456 P.2d 925.

64 citing documents.

Advanced Property Tax v. Jorge Othon and Spouse Ariz. 2023
Advanced Property Tax v. Jorge Othon and Spouse Ariz. 2023
v. Hudson Oil Co., see also Koven, 128 Ariz. at 321 (“The right of an insurer to move to set aside a default judgment against its insured, either on behalf of the insured or on its own behalf, is well recognized in Arizona.” ()).
Gonzalez v. Nguyen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gonzalez v. Nguyen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
has not had the opportunity of defending a suit on the merits.”
Scott v. Neal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Scott v. Neal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ezell v. Quon 233 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Ezell v. Quon 233 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Goglia v. Bodnar 749 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Goglia v. Bodnar 749 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Beal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 729 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Beal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 729 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Powercraft Homes, Inc. 685 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Powercraft Homes, Inc. 685 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Daou v. Harris 678 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1984
Daou v. Harris 678 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1984
Viewing the facts in the strongest light possible in favor of supporting the trial court's decision, , , we find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding Harris' administrative inadvertence not to be excusable.
French v. Angelic 669 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
French v. Angelic 669 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc. 666 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1983
Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc. 666 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1983
Hawke v. Bell 663 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Hawke v. Bell 663 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
483 , vacated on other grounds, , we held that “when proof of damage after a default in an unliquidated damage case is as scanty as that presented to the court here, an order setting aside a default judgment, but not the default itself, is justified.” Subsequent Arizona decisions have applied the principles espoused in Camacho.
Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 652 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1982
Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 652 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1982
Union Oil Co. of California v. Hudson Oil Co. 640 P.2d 847 Ariz. 1982
Union Oil Co. of California v. Hudson Oil Co. 640 P.2d 847 Ariz. 1982
Koven v. Saberdyne Systems, Inc.
Kellner v. Lewis 636 P.2d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Kellner v. Lewis 636 P.2d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Mayhew v. McDougall, 16 Ariz.App.
Koven v. Saberdyne Systems, Inc. 625 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Koven v. Saberdyne Systems, Inc. 625 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Edler v. Edler, 9 Ariz.App.
Ursel v. Pizzo 614 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
East v. Hedges 608 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Ursel v. Pizzo 614 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Explained East v. Hedges 608 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Armstrong v. City Court of Scottsdale 578 P.2d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Armstrong v. City Court of Scottsdale 578 P.2d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
483 , vacated on other grounds, , Harmon v. Hanson’s Pump & Machine Works, Inc., 4 Ariz.App.
Manny v. Estate of Anderson 574 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Manny v. Estate of Anderson 574 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Phillips v. Findlay 507 P.2d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Phillips v. Findlay 507 P.2d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Rather, , and Smith v. Monroe, 15 Ariz.App.
Mayhew v. McDougall 491 P.2d 848 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Mayhew v. McDougall 491 P.2d 848 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Mr. Cole is directed to prepare a written form of judgment for the Court’s signature.” , he is entitled to have the default judgment and entry of default set aside.
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
Coconino Pulp and Paper Co. v. Marvin, supra; , Thunderbird Farms v. Hernandez, 11 Ariz.App.
Smith v. Monroe 488 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Smith v. Monroe 488 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Johnson v. Franco 487 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Johnson v. Franco 487 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
The Supreme Court’s latest
Rhodes Western v. Clarke 480 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Rhodes Western v. Clarke 480 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
The Court of Appeals Camacho opinion was vacated by our Supreme Court on review