Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kilpatrick v. Superior Court, 466 P.2d 18.

154 citing documents.

Vega v. Sullivan 19 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Vega v. Sullivan 19 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Apache County 18 P.3d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Apache County 18 P.3d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
(quoting Kilpa *407 , ).
Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc. 984 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1999
Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc. 984 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1999
Kilpatrick v. Su *451 perior Court
Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. 978 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. 978 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
5 *148 ¶ 14 As construed by our supreme court, article 2, § 31 precludes the legislature from imposing “an absolute prohibition against suing” another or “limiting] recovery to [an] amount provided by the Legislature.” , (holding that, under former worker’s compensation statutes, employee had right of action against fellow employee for injuries sustained in course of employment).
State v. Getz 944 P.2d 503 Ariz. 1997
State v. Getz 944 P.2d 503 Ariz. 1997
We are not at liberty to impose our view about the way we feel things should be “simply because that’s what must have been intended, otherwise no statute, contract or recorded word, no matter how explicit, could be saved from judicial tinkering.”
Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 904 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1995
Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 904 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1995
Compare Ruth, 107 Ariz. at 576, 490 P.2d at 832 (upholding validity of the statute giving the Industrial Commission a lien on the amount recovered by an injured worker exercising the option to sue a third-party tortfeasor), and Church v. Rawson Drug & Sundry Co., , , (invalidating under article 2, section 31 a statute limiting the liability of an employee for injury inflicted on a co-employee to the amount allowed by compensation benefits).
Tallent v. National General Insurance 903 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Valdez 894 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Valdez 894 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Rowley Plastering Co. v. Marvin Gardens Development Corp. 883 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Rowley Plastering Co. v. Marvin Gardens Development Corp. 883 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Martinez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 856 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Martinez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 856 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
cited in Padilla v. Industrial Comm’n
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Apache County 831 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Apache County 831 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore 812 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1991
6 “There is no magic in statutory construction and no legal legerdemain should be used to change the meaning of simple English words____”
Tracy v. Superior Court 810 P.2d 1030 Ariz. 1991
State v. Korzep 799 P.2d 831 Ariz. 1990
State v. Korzep 799 P.2d 831 Ariz. 1990
In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2 790 P.2d 723 Ariz. 1990
In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2 790 P.2d 723 Ariz. 1990
: Courts are not at liberty to impose their views of the way things ought to be simply because that’s what must have been intended, otherwise no statute, contract or recorded word, no matter how explicit, could be saved from judicial tinkering.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 781 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 781 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Prescott Newspapers, Inc. v. Yavapai Community Hospital Ass'n 785 P.2d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Prescott Newspapers, Inc. v. Yavapai Community Hospital Ass'n 785 P.2d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
McPeak v. Industrial Commission 741 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
McPeak v. Industrial Commission 741 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 186 Ariz. 1986
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 186 Ariz. 1986
Its language is plain, clear, and “all-inclusive.”
Bussanich v. Douglas 733 P.2d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Bussanich v. Douglas 733 P.2d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
ensive and litigious remedies for injuries to or death of such workmen, now existing in the State of Arizona, and producing uncertain and unequal compensation therefor, such employee, engaged in such private employment, may exercise the option to settle for compensation by failing to reject the provisions of such Workmen’s Compensation Law prior to the injury____” , the supreme *449 court concluded that the 1925 amendment to this section, broadening coverage and requiring an election of remedies
Allen v. Southwest Salt Co. 718 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Allen v. Southwest Salt Co. 718 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
indicates that this principle is acceptable in Arizona in an intentional tort setting.
Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 718 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 718 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 708 P.2d 1307 Ariz. 1985
Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 708 P.2d 1307 Ariz. 1985
417 n. 2, , 22 n. 2 (1970) (emphasis added).
Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co. 692 P.2d 280 Ariz. 1984
Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co. 692 P.2d 280 Ariz. 1984
1 The test of “reasonable election” , and Ruth v. Industrial Commission, supra, and is, we believe, still a proper test.
McClellan v. Sentry Indemnity Co. 683 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
McClellan v. Sentry Indemnity Co. 683 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984