Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bedwell v. Industrial Commission, 454 P.2d 985.

126 citing documents.

Corr v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Corr v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
The test for appellate review of an Industrial Commission award was set out by the Arizona Supreme Court in Estate of Bedwell, , : “[I]t must appear that the evidence was such that, as a matter of law, the award of the commission cannot be sustained because there is no reasonable basis in the evidence upon which the commission could have reached its conclusion.” (Citations omitted) In Steward v. Industrial Commiss
Matthews v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Matthews v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
The test for appellate review of an Industrial Commission award was set out by the Arizona Supreme Court in Estate of Bedwell, , : “[I]t must appear that the evidence was such that as a matter of law, the award of the commission cannot be sustained because there is no reasonable basis in the evidence upon which the commission could have reached its conclusion.” The injury complained of here is one clearly defined
Godwin v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 1257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Godwin v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 1257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
reopen his claim to secure an increase or rearrangement of compensation or additional benefits by filing with the commission a petition requesting the reopening of his claim upon the basis of new, additional or previously undiscovered temporary or permanent condition * * The test for appellate review of an Industrial Commission award was set out by the Arizona Supreme Court in Estate of Bedwell, , : “[I]t must appear that the evidence was such that, as a matter of law, the award of the commissio
Vossler v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Vossler v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Royal-Globe Insurance v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Royal-Globe Insurance v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Wallis v. Industrial Commission 485 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Wallis v. Industrial Commission 485 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Viewing the record in a light most favorable to upholding the award of the Commission, , our examination of the relevant testimony presented at the hearing reveals that the Commission’s award was based upon reasonable evidence.
Williams v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Williams v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Sloan v. Industrial Commission 483 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Sloan v. Industrial Commission 483 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
“A Yes.” , is controlling.
Darst v. Industrial Commission 480 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Darst v. Industrial Commission 480 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
In re Estate of Bedwell (Bedwell v. Industrial Commission of Arizona)
State Compensation Fund v. Bannister 476 P.2d 875 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State Compensation Fund v. Bannister 476 P.2d 875 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Seeley v. Industrial Commission 472 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Seeley v. Industrial Commission 472 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Hooton v. Industrial Commission 459 P.2d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Hooton v. Industrial Commission 459 P.2d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
: “ * * * The test in reviewing an award denying compensation is that it must appear that the evidence was such that, as a matter of law; the award of 'the commission cannot be sustained because there is no' reasonable basis in'the'fevi-dence upon which the commission- coul'd *427 ha
Enyart v. Industrial Commission 458 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Enyart v. Industrial Commission 458 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969