Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Pandeli, 26 P.3d 1136.
- State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson 509 P.3d 1023 Ariz. 2022
-
State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson
509 P.3d 1023
Ariz. 2022
See, e.g., State v. Pandeli (Pandeli I), –76 ¶¶ 40–41 (2001) (deeming it needless mutilation to excise both of victim’s breasts after her death), vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 953 (2002).
- State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli 394 P.3d 2 Ariz. 2017
-
State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli
394 P.3d 2
Ariz. 2017
State v. Pandeli (Pandeli I), –83 ¶ 94, –54 (2001).
- State of Arizona v. Ronnie Lovelle Joseph 283 P.3d 27 Ariz. 2012
-
State of Arizona v. Ronnie Lovelle Joseph
283 P.3d 27
Ariz. 2012
¶ 88, vacated on other grounds, Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S 584, 122 S.Ct.
- State v. Pete J. Vanwinkle 285 P.3d 308 Ariz. 2012
-
State v. Pete J. Vanwinkle
285 P.3d 308
Ariz. 2012
¶ 88, vacated on other grounds, Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct.
- State v. Isiah Patterson 283 P.3d 1 Ariz. 2012
- State v. Isiah Patterson 283 P.3d 1 Ariz. 2012
- State of Arizona v. Jahmari Ali Manuel 270 P.3d 828 Ariz. 2011
- State of Arizona v. Jahmari Ali Manuel 270 P.3d 828 Ariz. 2011
- State v. Dixon 250 P.3d 1174 Ariz. 2011
-
State v. Dixon
250 P.3d 1174
Ariz. 2011
¶ 90, vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 953, 122 S. Ct. 2654 (2002)(mem.)
- State v. Delahanty 250 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2011
-
State v. Delahanty
250 P.3d 1131
Ariz. 2011
¶ 88, vacated on other grounds, Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct.
- State v. Don Chappell 236 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2010
- State v. Don Chappell 236 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2010
- State v. Womble 235 P.3d 244 Ariz. 2010
- State v. Womble 235 P.3d 244 Ariz. 2010
- State v. Hargrave 234 P.3d 569 Ariz. 2010
-
State v. Hargrave
234 P.3d 569
Ariz. 2010
V, VI, VIII, XIV; Ariz. Const. Art. II, § 15; at 382, ¶ 92, at 1153 (2002), vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 953 (2002).
- State v. Cropper 225 P.3d 579 Ariz. 2010
- State v. Cropper 225 P.3d 579 Ariz. 2010
- State v. KUHS 224 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2010
- State v. KUHS 224 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2010
- State v. Speer 212 P.3d 787 Ariz. 2009
-
State v. Speer
212 P.3d 787
Ariz. 2009
¶ 90, vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 953, 122 S.Ct.
- State v. Bearup 211 P.3d 684 Ariz. 2009
-
State v. Bearup
211 P.3d 684
Ariz. 2009
See, e.g., State v. Pandeli (Pandeli I), - 22 - 376, ¶ 41, (removing victim’s nipples after death constituted mutilation), vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 953 (2002) (mem.).
- State v. Nichols 195 P.3d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-
State v. Nichols
195 P.3d 207
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
¶ 17 , judgment vacated by Pandeli v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 953 , 122 S.Ct.
- State of Arizona v. Scott Douglas Nordstrom Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-
State of Arizona v. Scott Douglas Nordstrom
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
¶17 judgment vacated by Pandeli v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 953 (2002), in which our supreme court stated it had not previously “invoked residual doubt as a mitigating circumstance,” n.7, n.7 (2001) (Harrod I), judgment vacated by Harrod v
- State v. Bocharski 189 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2008
-
State v. Bocharski
189 P.3d 403
Ariz. 2008
See, e.g., State v. Pandeli (Pandeli I), 200 Ariz. 365, 376 ¶ 41, (excising parts of the victim’s breasts after her death); State v. Vickers, 129 Ariz. 506, 515, (carving of word “Bonzai” in victim’s back after killing him).
- State v. Armstrong 189 P.3d 378 Ariz. 2008
-
State v. Armstrong
189 P.3d 378
Ariz. 2008
We rejected the first contention in State v. Pandeli (Pandeli I), ¶ 90, vacated on other grounds by Pandeli v. Arizona (Pandeli II), 536 U.S. 953 (2002); we rejected the second in State v. 25 Ring (Ring I), ¶ 64, rev’d on other grounds by Ring II, 536 U.S. a
- State v. Martinez 189 P.3d 348 Ariz. 2008
-
State v. Martinez
189 P.3d 348
Ariz. 2008
Rejected in State v. Pandeli (Pandeli I), 200 Ariz. 365, 382, ¶ 90, judgment vacated on other grounds by Pandeli v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 953 (2002).
- State v. Cruz 181 P.3d 196 Ariz. 2008
-
State v. Cruz
181 P.3d 196
Ariz. 2008
This Court rejected this argument in State v. Pandeli (Pandeli I), ¶ 90, vacated on other grounds by Pandeli v. Arizona (Pandeli II), 536 U.S. 953 (2002).
- State v. Harrod 183 P.3d 519 Ariz. 2008
- State v. McCray 183 P.3d 503 Ariz. 2008
-
State v. McCray
183 P.3d 503
Ariz. 2008
See State v. Pandeli (“Pandeli I”)
-
State v. Harrod
183 P.3d 519
Ariz. 2008
¶ 88, vacated on other grounds, Ring II, 536 U.S. 584
- State v. Pandeli 161 P.3d 557 Ariz. 2007
-
State v. Pandeli
161 P.3d 557
Ariz. 2007
State v. Pandeli (Pandeli I), -83, ¶ 94, -54 (2001).
- State v. Andriano 161 P.3d 540 Ariz. 2007
-
State v. Andriano
161 P.3d 540
Ariz. 2007
We rejected this argument in State v. Pandeli, 200 Ariz. 365, 382, ¶ 90, vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 953 (2002).