Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Pandeli, 26 P.3d 1136.

64 citing documents.

State v. Morris 160 P.3d 203 Ariz. 2007
State v. Morris 160 P.3d 203 Ariz. 2007
¶ 90, vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 953 (2002) (mem.).
State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
¶ 88, vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 953 (2002); -47, -34 (1988).
State v. Cromwell 119 P.3d 448 Ariz. 2005
State v. Cromwell 119 P.3d 448 Ariz. 2005
¶ 88, vacated on other grounds, Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002)
State v. Glassel 116 P.3d 1193 Ariz. 2005
State v. Glassel 116 P.3d 1193 Ariz. 2005
We rejected that argument, at least when judges weighed aggravating and mitigating factors, ¶ 90, vacated on other grounds by Pandeli v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 953 (2002).
State v. Ring 65 P.3d 915 Ariz. 2003
State v. Ring 65 P.3d 915 Ariz. 2003
State v. Prion 52 P.3d 189 Ariz. 2002
State v. Prion 52 P.3d 189 Ariz. 2002
¶27 For an error to be reversible, it must be clearly prejudicial and “sufficient to create a reasonable doubt about whether the verdict might have been different had the error not been committed.” ¶18 (2001) (citations omitted).
State v. Smith 50 P.3d 825 Ariz. 2002
State v. Smith 50 P.3d 825 Ariz. 2002