Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Spreitz, 39 P.3d 525.

329 citing documents.

State v. Elia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Elia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P. 33.2(a)(3) (precluding petitioner from obtaining relief on a constitutional claim waived in a previous PCR proceeding); ¶ 4 (2002) (precluding successive IAC claims when they were, or could have been, raised in a prior PCR proceeding); see also Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 9 (2002) (“[I]neffective assistance of counsel claims are to be brought in Rule 32 proceedings.
State v. Waters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Waters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
will not be addressed by appellate courts regardless of merit.” ¶ 9 (2002).
State v. Billie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Billie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Vela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Vela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Wheaton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Wheaton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
that a defendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding—not before trial, at trial, or on direct review.”); ¶ 9 (2002) (“[I]neffective assistance 4 STATE v. CHAMBERS Decision of the Court of counsel claims are to be brought in Rule 32 proceedings.
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
will not be addressed by appellate courts regardless of merit.” ¶ 9 (2002).
State v. Mullener Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mullener Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 9 (2002) (stating that ineffective assistance 4 STATE v. MULLENER Decision of the Court of counsel claims "improvidently raised in a direct appeal .
State v. Kamara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Kamara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Thomas v. Rayes, 214 Ariz 411, 414, ¶ 16 (2007) ( ¶ 9 (2002)).
State v. Pruitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Pruitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Workum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Workum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 9 (2002) (reiterating that “the appellate court simply will not address” ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal, as such claims “are to be brought in Rule 32 proceedings”).
State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
will not be addressed by appellate courts regardless of merit.” ¶ 9 (2002).
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Saulsberry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Saulsberry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 16 (2007) ( ¶ 9 (2002)).
State v. Pintarich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Pintarich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
will not be addressed by appellate courts regardless of merit.” ¶ 9 (2002).
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Petty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Petty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019