Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Armstrong, 93 P.3d 1061.

115 citing documents.

State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
¶124 The State must show a “connection between the murder and motive through direct or strong circumstantial evidence.” ¶ 7, (quoting Ring III, 204 Ariz. at 560 ¶ 76, 65 P.3d at 941).
State v. Henderson 115 P.3d 601 Ariz. 2005
State v. Brown 115 P.3d 128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Brown 115 P.3d 128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
See, ¶¶ 10, 11 , -80 (2004); , ¶¶ 5, 8 , -34 (2003).
State v. Rivera 109 P.3d 83 Ariz. 2005
State v. Rivera 109 P.3d 83 Ariz. 2005
See Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154-55 (1972); ¶ 39
State v. Chiappetta 107 P.3d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Chiappetta 107 P.3d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
(reversal not required where rancorous exchanges between counsel were conducted in jury's absence).
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Speers 98 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Speers 98 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
( , ); ¶ 7, n. 2 , , 1079 n. 2 (2004) (confirming this court’s application of the Hyde and Wallace standards).