Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Moody, 94 P.3d 1119.

716 citing documents.

State v. McGill 140 P.3d 930 Ariz. 2006
State v. Grell 135 P.3d 696 Ariz. 2006
State v. Grell 135 P.3d 696 Ariz. 2006
State v. Booker 135 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. Booker 135 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. Newell 132 P.3d 833 Ariz. 2006
State v. Newell 132 P.3d 833 Ariz. 2006
Bohsancurt v. Tucson City Prosecutor's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Bohsancurt v. Tucson City Prosecutor's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
(“Although we review a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence under exceptions to the hearsay rule for abuse of discretion, we review a trial court’s determination of a Confrontation Clause violation de novo.”)
State v. Glassel 116 P.3d 1193 Ariz. 2005
State v. Glassel 116 P.3d 1193 Ariz. 2005
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Allen May Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Allen May Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
n that the state may not retry him on the felony charge of aggravated DUI under § 28-1383(A)(3).9 ¶25 Although May neither argues nor cites the Double Jeopardy Clause in support of his argument, that clause “‘forbids a second trial for the purpose of affording the prosecution another opportunity to supply evidence which it failed to muster in the first proceeding.’” quoting Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 11, 98 S. Ct. 2141, 2147, 57 L. Ed. 2d 1, 9 (1978).
State v. Roseberry 111 P.3d 402 Ariz. 2005
State v. Roseberry 111 P.3d 402 Ariz. 2005
State v. Murdaugh 97 P.3d 844 Ariz. 2004