Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Aguilar, 97 P.3d 865.

157 citing documents.

State v. Newell 132 P.3d 833 Ariz. 2006
In re MH 2004-001987 120 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 120 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In re MH 2004-001987 120 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
‘We interpret court rules' according to the principles of statutory construction.” ¶ 23
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 120 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Williams 99 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Williams 99 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
In fact, the clear intent of our supreme court in promulgating subsection (c) of Rule 404 was to “broaden[ ] the types of sexual offense cases in which other act evidence might be admissible.” ¶ 26 , see also Adam Kargman, Three Maelstroms and One Tweak: Federal Rules of Evidence flS to 115 and Their Arizona Counterpart, 41 Ariz. L.Rev.