Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Smith, 159 P.3d 531.

115 citing documents.

State v. Garcia 226 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2010
State v. Garcia 226 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2010
¶ 42, (concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing defendant’s request to ask jurors if they would automatically impose death upon finding specific aggravators); -35 ¶¶ 29-35, 133 P.3d
State v. Moore 213 P.3d 150 Ariz. 2009
State v. Moore 213 P.3d 150 Ariz. 2009
¶ 37, Ellison, 213 Ariz. at 137 ¶ 88, 140 P.3d at 920.
State v. Dann 207 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2009
State v. Dann 207 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2009
State v. Boggs 185 P.3d 111 Ariz. 2008
State v. Boggs 185 P.3d 111 Ariz. 2008
The right is not violated, however, “by use of a statement to prove something other than the truth of the matter asserted.” ¶ 26, see also Roque, 213 Ariz. at 214 ¶ 70, 141 P.3d at 389.
State v. Harrod 183 P.3d 519 Ariz. 2008
State v. McCray 183 P.3d 503 Ariz. 2008
State v. McCray 183 P.3d 503 Ariz. 2008
State v. Harrod 183 P.3d 519 Ariz. 2008
State v. Pandeli 161 P.3d 557 Ariz. 2007
State v. Pandeli 161 P.3d 557 Ariz. 2007
A defendant does not have the right to “commit [prospective jurors] to certain positions prior to receiving the evidence.” cf. State v. Smith, ___ Ariz. ___, ___, ¶ 42, (holding that a trial court need not permit a defendant to question jurors about their assessment of specific aggravating factors).
State v. Garza 163 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2007