Cited by

I. Background ¶35 In reviewing the trial court’s denial of the acquittal motions, we “determine whether ‘substantial evidence exists to support the jury verdict,’ viewing the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict.” ().

¶11 In his supplemental brief, Moreno argues there was no credible evidence against him, emphasizing “they didn’t catch me with drugs” and accusing the State of “present[ing] false evidence.” ¶12 It is “fundamental error to convict a person for a crime when the evidence does not support a conviction.” ¶ 6 n.2 (2005) (citation omitted).

“In determining whether substantial evidence exists, we view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury verdict and resolve all inferences against [the defendant].” ¶ 6 (2005).

fundamental error to convict a person for a crime when the evidence does not support a conviction.” ¶ 93 (2022) ( ¶ 6 n. 2 (2005)).

sentencing, “[t]he improper use of a conviction as a historical prior felony conviction for enhancement purposes constitutes fundamental error.” ¶ 8 (App. 2007); ¶ 5 (1997) (claim that sentence should have been enhanced based on one, not two, prior convictions, can be raised for first time on appeal); ¶¶ 20–21 (2005) (remanding for resentencing where the court misapplied the law even though the defendant affirmatively contributed to that misapplication).

¶ 11 (2005) (an officer telling “he was under arrest” while grabbing defendant’s shirt collar before defendant “broke free” constitutes sufficient evidence of “custody” for purposes of escape conviction).

¶ 21 (2005) (“When a trial court labors under a misunderstanding of the sentencing law .

It is “fundamental error to convict a person for a crime when the evidence does not support a conviction.” ¶ 6 n.2 (2005) (citation omitted).