Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1743 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Gary Edward Cox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Gary Edward Cox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, ¶¶ 23-26, -09 (2005).
In Re Natalie Z. 153 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
In Re Natalie Z. 153 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Ricky Lee Sabin 146 P.3d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State of Arizona v. Ricky Lee Sabin 146 P.3d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. McIntosh 146 P.3d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. McIntosh 146 P.3d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. Londo 158 P.3d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. Londo 158 P.3d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
¶ 19 , , (holding that the State did not have the burden to prove voluntariness of statement, absent filing of proeedurally proper suppression motion).
State v. Alvarez 143 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. Alvarez 143 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
By failing to object below on Sixth Amendment grounds, Alvarez “forfeit[ed] the right to obtain appellate relief unless [he] prove[s] that fundamental error occurred.” n. 2 , , 620 n. 2 (2005); , (“Fundamental error review ...
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
¶ 19, (fundamental error standard applies if no objection made at trial).
State of Arizona v. James Albert Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State of Arizona v. James Albert Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
052129.” 7 Henderson, ¶¶ 19, 20, n.2, n.2 (2005).
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Scott MacHado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Scott MacHado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. Newell 132 P.3d 833 Ariz. 2006
State v. Newell 132 P.3d 833 Ariz. 2006
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” State v. - 15 - Henderson, ¶ 19, ( ).
State v. Gastelum 130 P.3d 547 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. Gastelum 130 P.3d 547 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. Urquidez 138 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. Urquidez 138 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
n. 2 , , 620 n. 2 (2005) (“Defendants who fail to object to error at trial do not, strictly speaking, ‘waive’ their claims.
State of Arizona v. Andrew James Raymond Burdick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Andrew James Raymond Burdick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
On review, P.3d 618 (2005), P.3d 601 (2005).
State v. Gomez 123 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2005
State v. Gomez 123 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2005
¶21 Error is fundamental if it “goes to the foundation of 8 [the defendant’s] case, takes away a right that is essential to his defense, and is of such magnitude that he could not have received a fair trial.” ¶ 24
State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Miles 123 P.3d 669 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Miles 123 P.3d 669 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
[is] of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.’ ”
State v. Keith 122 P.3d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Keith 122 P.3d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Ward 118 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Ward 118 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
We vacate the order of summary dismissal and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this decision and the supreme court’s
State of Arizona v. Juan Manuel Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Juan Manuel Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
7 Rather, defendants who fail to object to an error below forfeit the right to obtain appellate relief unless they prove that fundamental error occurred.” n.2, n.2 (2005); (“Fundamental error review .
Monica C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 118 P.3d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Monica C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 118 P.3d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Glassel 116 P.3d 1193 Ariz. 2005
State v. Glassel 116 P.3d 1193 Ariz. 2005
- 50 - ___ ¶ 19, ___ (2005).
State v. Martinez 115 P.3d 618 Ariz. 2005