Cited by

-69, ¶¶ 19-26 (2005); ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).

¶ 18 (2005) (stating courts review for harmless error when defendant objects and preserves issue for appeal).

¶ 19 (2005); see also Ariz. R. Crim.

at 140 ¶ 13 ( ¶¶ 19–20 (2005)).

-69, ¶¶ 19-26 (2005); ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).

¶53 Therefore, the Majority’s holding that the erroneous instructions—concerning a defense Hippensteel never relied upon—deprived him of a “right essential to [the] defense” is unsupported by the record before us. See Escalante, 245 Ariz. at 140 ¶ 13 ( ¶ 19 (2005)).

at 486 ¶ 38, when the defendant objected to the violation at trial, ¶ 8 (2005).

“Harmless error review places the burden on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict or sentence.” ¶ 18 (2005).

“Harmless error review places the burden on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict or sentence.” ¶ 18 (2005).

“[T]o establish fundamental error, [a parent] must show that the error complained of goes to the foundation of the case, takes away a right that is essential to his defense, and is of such magnitude that he could not have received a fair trial.” Monica C., 211 Ariz. at 94, at ¶ 24 ( ¶ 24 (2005)).

P. 21.3(b); ¶¶ 19–20 (2005); ¶ 21 (2018).

United States v. Huang, 960 F.2d 1128, 1135 (2d Cir. 1992) (discussing “plain error”); ¶ 19 (2005) (we review for fundamental error when the defendant fails to object to the alleged error at trial); ¶ 14 (App. 2021) (citing the federal plain error doctrine because it is analogous to Arizona’s fundamental error doctrine).

17, 2013) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (under fundamental error review, defendant must “affirmatively prove prejudice and may not rely upon speculation to carry his burden”), ¶ 18 (2005) (“Harmless error review places the burden on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict or sentence.”).