Cited by

of pornographic materials may be considered to be causing the children depicted in those materials to suffer as a result of his actions in at least three ways”—perpetuation of original abuse, invasion of children’s privacy, and instigation of original production of such materials by supplying economic incentive.); (child pornography victims harmed not only by production of images but also by invasion of privacy in others’ continued possession of such images).

Further, given our “substantial deference” to the Legislature in determining an appropriate consequence for criminal behavior, , 476 ¶ 13, cert.

Action No. JD-6123, , (“[T]he state and its citizens have a compelling state interest in ensuring that all children in Arizona are provided with appropriate care and are free from parental abuse or neglect.”); , (state’s compelling interest in mental and physical health of children self-evident), citing Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103, 109 , 110 S.Ct.

(acknowledging ongoing harm to child pornography victims arising from continuing violation of their privacy and continuing disclosure of “‘personal matters’”), quoting United States v. Sherman, 268 F.3d 539, 547 (7th Cir. 2001).

¶56 “[O]nly in ‘exceedingly rare’ cases will a sentence to a term of years violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.” cert.