Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Tucker, 160 P.3d 177.
- State v. Boggs 185 P.3d 111 Ariz. 2008
- State v. Harrod 183 P.3d 519 Ariz. 2008
- State v. McCray 183 P.3d 503 Ariz. 2008
-
State v. McCray
183 P.3d 503
Ariz. 2008
“We review de novo whether jury instructions adequately state the law.” ¶ 27, cert.
-
State v. Harrod
183 P.3d 519
Ariz. 2008
at 523; see also State v. 20 Tucker (Tucker II), ¶ 79, cert.
- State v. Velazquez 166 P.3d 91 Ariz. 2007
-
State v. Velazquez
166 P.3d 91
Ariz. 2007
State v. Tucker, ___ Ariz. ___, ___ ¶ 73, (citing Kansas v. Marsh, 126 S. Ct. 2516, 2525-26 (2006); Blystone v. Pennsylvania, 494 U.S. 299, 306-07 (1990)).
- State v. Garza 163 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2007