Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bennett, 146 P.3d 63.

392 citing documents.

State v. Burton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Moton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Moton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Burton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 21 (2006); see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688 (1984) (“The proper measure of attorney performance remains simply reasonableness under prevailing professional norms.”).
State v. Witherspoon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Helenick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Witherspoon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 14 (2006) (“[W]hen ‘ineffective assistance of counsel claims are raised, or could have been raised, in a Rule 32 post- conviction relief proceeding, subsequent claims of ineffective assistance will be deemed waived and precluded.’” (citation omitted)).
State v. Helenick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cloud Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cloud Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Braxton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Roque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Roque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 17 (2006) (citation omitted).
State v. Braxton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sprouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sprouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.2(a); ¶ 14 (2006).
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Doss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Doss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 17, (citation omitted).
State v. Flake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Flake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ojeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ojeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Luke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Luke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.2(a); 2 Luke asserts that, as a self-represented petitioner, he is entitled to be held to a lesser standard than a lawyer.
State v. Ely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hazzard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hazzard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.2(a); ¶ 14 (2006).
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Melville Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Melville Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“We review for abuse of discretion the superior court’s denial of post-conviction relief based on lack of a colorable claim.” ¶ 17, (citation omitted).
State v. Tiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017