Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bennett, 146 P.3d 63.

379 citing documents.

State v. Palazzetti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Getzen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶5 To merit an evidentiary hearing on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Palazzetti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this 2 STATE v. PALAZZETTI Decision of the Court deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Odette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Odette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687–88 (1984); ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Larsgard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Larsgard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688 (1984); ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 19 (2012) ( ¶ 17 (2006)).
State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 24 (2006) (noting only evidence presented to show defendant failed to promptly seek medical treatment for her son was the treating physician who speculated that the victim “may or may not have benefited from earlier medical treatment”); ¶¶ 20–22 (App. 2007) (noting th
State v. Varela 425 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Varela 425 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Bennett , , ¶ 21, ; see also Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687, 104 S.Ct.
State v. Lopata Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lopata Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Goldwater Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Goldwater Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citation omitted).
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Melendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ashley W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ashley W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶¶ 13–14 (App. 2007) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 696 (1984)).2 We presume Mother's counsel provided competent assistance, ¶ 22 (2006), and Mother must prove that her counsel's conduct fell below the standard of professional competence and demonstrate a reasonable probability that "but for counsel's errors, the result would have been different."
State v. Melendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We review the summary dismissal of a post-conviction relief proceeding for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 17 (2006) (), and will affirm “on any basis supported by the record,” (citing M. Udall & J. Livermore, Law of Evidence § 13, at 22 (2d ed. 1982)).
State v. Dwyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dwyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Leininger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Roper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Roper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 21 (2006); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688 (1984).
State v. Leininger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Burton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Moton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Moton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Burton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 21 (2006); see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688 (1984) (“The proper measure of attorney performance remains simply reasonableness under prevailing professional norms.”).
State v. Witherspoon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Helenick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Helenick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Witherspoon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 14 (2006) (“[W]hen ‘ineffective assistance of counsel claims are raised, or could have been raised, in a Rule 32 post- conviction relief proceeding, subsequent claims of ineffective assistance will be deemed waived and precluded.’” (citation omitted)).
State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cloud Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017