Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bennett, 146 P.3d 63.

392 citing documents.

State v. Baldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Baldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶4 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Blazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Blazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“Failure to satisfy either prong of the Strickland test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Marusich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Marusich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
eath.’” 33 STATE V. ALLEN Opinion of the Court ¶114 Felony murder’s independent causation element required the State to prove only that “‘in the course of and in furtherance of’ an enumerated felony, including child abuse, that defendant ‘causes the death of any person.’” ¶ 23 (2006) (quoting A.R.S.
State v. Linville Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Linville Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶5 “We review for abuse of discretion the superior court’s denial of post-conviction relief based on lack of a colorable claim.” State v. Bennett, 2 STATE v. JONES Decision of the Court ¶ 17 (2006).
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
To establish a colorable IAC claim, the defendant “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 21 (2006) (noting “a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.”).
State v. Mattox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mattox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶17 “To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the 5 STATE v. MATTOX Decision of the Court defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Ruzzo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Ruzzo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Curry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Curry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
But a defendant is entitled to a hearing if a non-precluded PCR claim “is colorable.” ¶ 17 (2006).
State of Arizona v. Ronald Bruce Bigger 492 P.3d 1020 Ariz. 2021
State of Arizona v. Ronald Bruce Bigger 492 P.3d 1020 Ariz. 2021
P. 32.13; 1 ¶ 30 (2006).
State v. Bonney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Bonney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Lovelis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Lovelis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
3 STATE v. LOVELIS Decision of the Court ¶13 To succeed on a “claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel's performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Wagner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Wagner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 21 (2006) (“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.”).
State v. Phifer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Phifer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Dumont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Dumont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Lawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Lawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P. Rule 33.1(a); ¶ 21 (2006) (“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.”) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Granado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Granado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Calvillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Garcia Del Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Calvillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
To state a colorable claim, the petitioner “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced [him].” ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Garcia Del Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020