Cited by

eath.’” 33 STATE V. ALLEN Opinion of the Court ¶114 Felony murder’s independent causation element required the State to prove only that “‘in the course of and in furtherance of’ an enumerated felony, including child abuse, that defendant ‘causes the death of any person.’” ¶ 23 (2006) (quoting A.R.S.

¶5 “We review for abuse of discretion the superior court’s denial of post-conviction relief based on lack of a colorable claim.” State v. Bennett, 2 STATE v. JONES Decision of the Court ¶ 17 (2006).

To establish a colorable IAC claim, the defendant “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006).

¶ 21 (2006) (noting “a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.”).

¶17 “To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the 5 STATE v. MATTOX Decision of the Court defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

But a defendant is entitled to a hearing if a non-precluded PCR claim “is colorable.” ¶ 17 (2006).

P. 32.13; 1 ¶ 30 (2006).

3 STATE v. LOVELIS Decision of the Court ¶13 To succeed on a “claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel's performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006).

¶ 21 (2006) (“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.”).

“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

P. Rule 33.1(a); ¶ 21 (2006) (“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.”) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

To state a colorable claim, the petitioner “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced [him].” ¶ 21 (2006).

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); ¶ 21 (2006).

¶ 19 (2012) ( ¶ 17 (2006)).

¶ 23 (2006), she argues the court erred by not instructing the jury that to prove felony murder by child abuse based on a failure to obtain medical treatment, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the "[victim's] death 'would not have happened' without [defendant's] delay in seeking medical attenti

2 STATE v. ALVARADO Decision of the Court ¶5 A defendant states a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel by showing “both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006).

To merit an evidentiary hearing on an ineffective assistance claim, “a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984), superseded by statute on other grounds, Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.

¶13 To establish a colorable claim that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance, “a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006).