Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bennett, 146 P.3d 63.

379 citing documents.

State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Cameron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Button Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Button Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶5 To state a colorable IAC claim, Button “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced [him].” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Kashkool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Aguayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Aguayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Kashkool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶7 To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Kashkool “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced [him].” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Jumper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Jumper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Riepe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Riepe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697 (“If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed.”); ¶ 21 (2006) (“Failure to 6 STATE v. RIEPE Decision of the Court satisfy either prong of the Strickland test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”).
State v. Mello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Mello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
To prevail, White “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced [him].” ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Russo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Russo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
To state a colorable IAC claim, the defendant “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Calandra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Calandra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Qureshi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Qureshi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
To state a colorable ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Bermea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Bermea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶12 “To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Cline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Cline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 21 (2006) (“Failure to satisfy either prong of the Strickland test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”).
State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
But a defendant is entitled to a hearing if a non-precluded claim for relief “is colorable.” ¶ 17 (2006); Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Baldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Baldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶4 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).
State v. Blazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Blazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“Failure to satisfy either prong of the Strickland test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” ¶ 21 (2006).
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Marusich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Marusich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022