Cited by

To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

¶7 “To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

“Failure to satisfy either prong of the Strickland test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” ¶ 21 (2006).

¶ 17 (2006) (citing cases).

¶5 “We review for abuse of discretion the superior court’s denial of post-conviction relief based on lack of a colorable claim.” ¶ 17 (2006).

¶5 To state a colorable IAC claim, Button “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced [him].” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

¶7 To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Kashkool “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced [him].” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); ¶ 21 (2006).

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); ¶ 21 (2006).

Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697 (“If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed.”); ¶ 21 (2006) (“Failure to 6 STATE v. RIEPE Decision of the Court satisfy either prong of the Strickland test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”).

To prevail, White “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced [him].” ¶ 21 (2006).

To state a colorable IAC claim, the defendant “must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

“To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

To state a colorable ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

¶12 “To state a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance fell below objectively reasonable standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the defendant.” ¶ 21 (2006) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

¶ 21 (2006) (“Failure to satisfy either prong of the Strickland test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”).

But a defendant is entitled to a hearing if a non-precluded claim for relief “is colorable.” ¶ 17 (2006); Ariz. R. Crim.