Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cheramie, 189 P.3d 374.

76 citing documents.

State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Rowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Rowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See State v. McNulty, ___ Ariz. ___, ___, ¶ 23, (The appropriate remedy when a defendant is convicted for both the greater and lesser-included offense is to vacate the conviction for the lesser.); 451, ¶¶ 10, 22 (2008) (Possession of a dangerous drug is a lesser-included offense of transportation for sale of a dangerous drug.).
State of Arizona v. Ronald David Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Ronald David Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
¶¶ 11, 22 (2008) (person cannot transport drugs without possessing them); (possession is lesser-included offense of possession for sale and transportation for sale).
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
But, 5 STATE v. BROWN Decision of the Court “[a] ‘usable quantity’ is neither an element of the possession offense nor necessary to sustain a conviction for it.” ¶ 21 (2008).
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 9 (2008) (“To constitute a lesser-included offense, the offense must be composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.”).
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See, ¶ 18 (2008); –62 (1971).
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 11 (2008) (“Given Arizona’s broad definition of ‘possess,’ we cannot conceive how a person can ‘transport’ drugs without having possession of or dominion or control over them.”); -66, ¶ 17 (App. 2015); Chabolla-Hinojosa, 192 Ariz. at 365, ¶ 21.
State v. Prado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Prado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 12 (2008) (citing Moroyoqui with approval).
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§ 13-3407 (2019), which 8 STATE v. WHITE Decision of the Court uses precisely the same nomenclature with respect to a "dangerous drug," that possession of a drug is a lesser-included offense of transporting or transferring the drug.
State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
State v. Cheramie , , ¶ 9
State v. Cronan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cronan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
The State concedes the point, concluding that “Cronan’s conviction and sentence for the lesser- included Count One should be vacated.” ¶ 11 (2008) (“Given Arizona’s broad definition of ‘possess,’ we cannot conceive how a person can ‘transport’ drugs without having possession of or dominion or control over them.”); ¶ 13 (App. 1998) (“Given the broad definition of ‘possess,’ when a possession for sale
State v. Trammell 433 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Trammell 433 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Cheramie , , ¶ 9, , 375-76 (2008) (quoting State v. Celaya , , 251, , 852 (1983) ).
State v. Matthews 428 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Matthews 428 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cheramie , , 448, ¶ 8, , 375 (2008).
State v. Suazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Suazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 20-22 (2008) (holding a “usable quantity” is not an element of possession of a dangerous drug).
State v. Curiel-Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Curiel-Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 22, (holding that possession of a dangerous drug is a lesser-included offense of transportation for sale of a dangerous drug); ¶ 13, (stating that “when a possession for sale charge is incidental to a transport
State of Arizona v. Michael Anthony Salcido 362 P.3d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Michael Anthony Salcido 362 P.3d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
(possession lesser-included offense of transportation for sale); (“For double jeopardy purposes, a lesser-included offense and the greater offense of which it is a part constitute the same offense, and multiple
State v. Swier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Swier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 17, (concluding that the State must only prove a defendant knowingly possessed narcotics in order to convict him for possession or use of dangerous drugs); see also A.R.S § 13-3407(a)(1) (2011) (“possess” and “use” are separated by “or,” signifying that proof of either may satisfy the
J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of Arizona 335 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2014
J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of Arizona 335 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2014
State v. Garcia 334 P.3d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia 334 P.3d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
This court reviews de novo whether a double jeopardy violation has occurred, ¶ 6, and whether an offense is a lesser-included offense, ¶ 8
State v. Estrada-Resendiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Estrada-Resendiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by