Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Steven John Parker, 296 P.3d 54.

204 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Amy Kay Gustafson 311 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Amy Kay Gustafson 311 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
On a motion for a judgment of acquittal “‘the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.’” State v. Parker, 231 Ariz. 391, ¶ 70, (emphasis omitted), quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979).
State of Arizona v. Efren Medina 306 P.3d 48 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Efren Medina 306 P.3d 48 Ariz. 2013
13 STATE V. MEDINA Opinion of the Court ¶54 “The Confrontation Clause bars admission of out of court testimonial evidence unless the defense has had an opportunity to cross- examine the declarant.” ¶ 38, (citing Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004)).