Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. West, 250 P.3d 1188.

680 citing documents.

State v. Cerrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Cerrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 23 (App. 2018) ( ¶¶ 15–16 (2011)).
State v. Eznack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Eznack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Roeschen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Roeschen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Purcell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hodge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Purcell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hodge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State Kingston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State Kingston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 5 (2014); ¶ 15 (2011).
State v. Freeman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Earl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Freeman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Earl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
at 591–92 ¶ 22 ( ¶ 16 (2011).
State v. Gomez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Gomez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. De Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Benitez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Benitez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. De Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶16 In determining whether substantial evidence would support a conviction for purposes of ruling on a Rule 20 motion, “the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 16 (2011) ().
State v. Conchola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Conchola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Rothrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Rothrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Interval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Interval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 16 (2011) (citation omitted).
State v. Gutierrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gutierrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Franko Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Franko Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Substantial evidence “is such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 16 (2011) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
State v. Blanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Blanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
I. Sufficiency of Evidence ¶9 When reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, we must consider “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 16 (2011).
State v. Williamson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Williamson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Hickey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Hickey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020