Cited by

¶ 32 (2015) (“Joinder is permitted if separate crimes arise from a series of connected acts and are provable by overlapping evidence.”).

¶9 “The purpose of jury instructions is to inform the jury of the applicable law,” (), and a “party is entitled to any jury instruction reasonably supported by the evidence,”

pursuing officer.” He argues that “even assuming the deputy’s encounter with Rodriguez initially amounted to a pursuit,” that pursuit “ended when the deputy turned off his lights and sirens and transitioned to surveillance mode.” A death occurs in the course or furtherance of an underlying felony if it “resulted from an action taken to facilitate the accomplishment of the felony.” ().

¶ 95 (2015) (allowing the restriction of expert testimony when the prosecutor had no chance to review the expert's analysis, the defense had not disclosed the expert's analysis before trial, and the expert could testify about other issues); Naranjo, 234 Ariz. at 245, ¶ 53 (finding no abuse of discretion for restr

–27, ¶¶ 113–21 (2015) (recognizing that the trial court investigated the matter and questioned the jurors after they received extraneous information); ¶ 3 (noting that the trial court held evidentiary hearings during which the court and counsel questioned each juror about their

“The Rules of Evidence do not apply to the admission of evidence during the penalty phase of a capital trial.” ¶ 130 (2015).

¶ 83 (2015) (multiplicity); ¶ 7 (2020) (double jeopardy).

¶ 7 (2023); ¶ 83 (2015) (de novo review of multiplicity claims); Carter, 249 Ariz. at 315, ¶ 7 (de novo review of double jeopardy claims).

¶ 23 (2015) (“A trial judge must consider the entirety of a prospective juror’s demeanor and behavior; if a juror’s promise to uphold the law is coupled with ambiguous statements and uncertainty, the trial judge may strike the juror for cause.”).

¶ 48 (2015); -65, ¶ 10 (App. 2005) (explaining courts err by giving an instruction "unless it is reasonably and clearly supported by the evidence").

¶22 “[E]vidence to support a conviction exists when ‘reasonable persons could accept [it] as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of [a] defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” ¶ 72 (2015) ( ¶ 16 (2011)).

¶ 47 (2015) (Source uncertainty goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility.).

“We will not find that a trial court abused its discretion in denying a continuance unless the defendant shows prejudice.” ¶ 10 (2015).

¶ 23 (2015) (“A potential juror need not object to the death penalty in every possible case to warrant a dismissal for cause.”).

¶ 38 (2015) (explaining that error is harmless when evidence of guilt is overwhelming).

¶¶ 69-70 (2015); ¶¶ 62-63 (2008)