Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II, 502 P.3d 437.

78 citing documents.

State v. Hon gordon/owen 544 P.3d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Hon gordon/owen 544 P.3d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Olivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Olivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Piper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Mitcham 535 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Mitcham 535 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
viewing it in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling,” ¶ 26 (2022).
State of Arizona v. Hon. chambers/henderson 533 P.3d 195 Ariz. 2023
State of Arizona v. Hon. chambers/henderson 533 P.3d 195 Ariz. 2023
“An error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion may constitute an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 26 (2022).
State v. Alvarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Alvarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶¶ 42–43 (2022) (finding no abuse of discretion when the trial court precluded under Rule 403 evidence that had minimal probative value and was offered for a purpose addressed by other evidence); ¶ 17 (App. 2020) (noting that the superior court “would not have exceeded its disc
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
exclude evidence only if,” inter alia, the party “informs the court of its substance by an offer of proof, unless the substance was apparent from the context.”); see also State v. Thompson, 6 STATE v. ANDERSON Decision of the Court ¶¶ 41-42 (2022) (holding that “[t]he trial court did not abuse its discretion” in precluding evidence under Rule 403 of murder victim’s alleged participation in criminal activity, in part because “the record does not reflect precisely what evidence was precluded”).
State v. Reese Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Reese Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State of Arizona v. Beau John Greene 527 P.3d 322 Ariz. 2023
.”); ¶ 53 (2022) (“[T]he death penalty cannot be imposed in the absence of aggravating circumstances.”).
State v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P. 31.10(a)(7) (opening briefs must contain argument with supporting citations to the record and legal authorities); –96, ¶ 57 (2022) (Appellant waived a claim by failing to develop argument and sufficiently cite the record.).
State v. Cardwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Cardwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 84 (2022) (waiving undeveloped, conclusory arguments).
State v. Land Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Land Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State v. Ervin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Ervin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See State v. Thompson, ___ Ariz. ___, ___, ¶ 63, (discussing the factors for determining the admissibility of a qualified expert’s opinion under Ariz. R. Evid.