Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mata, 916 P.2d 1035.

57 citing documents.

State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
riteria allegedly used to impose death Defendant argues that the court applied its own nonstatutory factors such as “moral outrage,” and improperly used him as “a vehicle to promote social control.” For a capital sentencing scheme to pass constitutional scrutiny, “discretion must be suitably directed and limited so as to minimize the risk of wholly arbitrary and capricious action.” , (quoting Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 189 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
This court has defined depraved as “marked by debasement, corruption, perversion or deterioration.” , , cert, denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct.
State v. Henry 944 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1997
State v. Henry 944 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1997
State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
3092, 3100-01 , 111 L.Ed.2d 606 (1990) (citations omitted); , (Zlaket, V.C.J., dissenting).