Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Conner, 786 P.2d 948.

257 citing documents.

State v. Conde 846 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
our supreme court held that a defendant whose confession without Miranda warnings was ruled admissible for impeachment could not challenge that ruling because he did not testify.
State v. Schaaf 819 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1991
State v. Schaaf 819 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1991
(defendant entitled to assistance of counsel at every critical stage of criminal proceedings); , (person is always entitled to assistance of an attorney, whether in custody or not); rule 6.1(a), Ariz.R.Crim.P., 17 A.
State v. Gendron 812 P.2d 626 Ariz. 1991
State v. Gendron 812 P.2d 626 Ariz. 1991
21.3(c), 17 A.R.S.; -02 , -53 (1990); State v. White, 160 Ariz, 24, 31, , -42 , -79 (App. 1980); see also A.R.S.
State v. West 812 P.2d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. West 812 P.2d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991