Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Amaya-Ruiz, 800 P.2d 1260.

414 citing documents.

State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
State v. Kiper 887 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Kiper 887 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Maturana 882 P.2d 933 Ariz. 1994
State v. Maturana 882 P.2d 933 Ariz. 1994
State v. Cornell 878 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1994
State v. Cornell 878 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1994
Moreover, this court rejected a , cert.
State v. Ramirez 871 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1994
State v. Ramirez 871 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1994
State v. Scott 865 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1993
State v. Scott 865 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1993
State v. Stuard 863 P.2d 881 Ariz. 1993
State v. Stuard 863 P.2d 881 Ariz. 1993
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993
State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
“In order to find an abuse of discretion, we must determine that the denial or restriction of investigative funds substantially prejudiced the defendant.” Clabourne, 142 Ariz. at 342 , 690 P.2d at 61 ; see also, , cert.
State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
(trial court has discretion to admit photographs, and we will not disturb trial court’s ruling without a clear abuse of discretion), cert.
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
1058 , 122 L.Ed.2d 364 (1993); -83 , -91 (1990), cert.
State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
436 n. 1, , 1218 n. 1 (1981); , cert.
State v. Cruz 857 P.2d 1249 Ariz. 1993
State v. Cruz 857 P.2d 1249 Ariz. 1993
See State v. Amaya- *401 Ruiz, -83 , -91 (1990), cert.
State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-501010 852 P.2d 414 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-501010 852 P.2d 414 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Martinez 854 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Martinez 854 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Duzan 862 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Duzan 862 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
401, 403, 608(b); , , cert.
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
State v. Lopez 847 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1992
State v. Lopez 847 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1992
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
State v. Hatfield 840 P.2d 300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Hatfield 840 P.2d 300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
“Confessions are presumed to be involuntary, and the state has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence to show that a confession was voluntary and not the product of physical or psychological coercion.” , cert.
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Rossi 830 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1992