DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Walton, 769 P.2d 1017.

173 citing documents.

  • State v. Roscoe 910 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1996
    aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
    The trial court’s decision will be reversed only if it’s “palpably improper and clearly injurious.” , aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
    (holding that carrying out a crime over a significant period of time shows relative maturity and minimizes the weight of young age as a mitigating factor), aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Krum 903 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Krum 903 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1995
    aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
    aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
    aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Barreras 892 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Barreras 892 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1995
    3047, 3056-58 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990), , Arizona’s death penalty discriminates against poor, young, and male defendants; is imposed arbitrarily and irrationally; and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, , 645 n. 21, , 662 n. 21, cert.
  • State v. Vickers 885 P.2d 1086 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Vickers 885 P.2d 1086 Ariz. 1994
    at 2068 ; , aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Averyt 876 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
  • State v. Averyt 876 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
    aff'd, Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
    If the instructions “are ‘substantially free from error,’ the defendant suffers no prejudice by their wording.”
  • State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
    and by expressly approving the panel at the conclusion of voir dire.” , (citations omitted); -81 , -27 (1989), aff'd on other grounds, Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
    (statute not constitutionally invalid for failing to require more detailed factual finding), aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
    (statute not constitutionally invalid for failing to require more detailed factual finding), aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
    See, , aff'd, Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
    See, -81 , -27 (1989), aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Runningeagle 859 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Runningeagle 859 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1993
    -92 , -38 (1989), aff'd 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Kiles 857 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
    -89 , -35 (1989), aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Kiles 857 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1993
    this court later determined that the trial court must “return a special verdict setting forth the existence or nonexistence of the ...
  • State v. Herrera, Jr. 859 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Herrera, Jr. 859 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1993
    “Prior to making the determination whether reasonable grounds exist, the trial judge may order a preliminary evaluation of the defendant.” , aff'd Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
    (Feldman, J., concurring), aff 'd, Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Harris 852 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Harris 852 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    aff'd 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
    3047, 3054-56 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511, 524-27 (1990)
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
    aff'd, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Rossi 830 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Rossi 830 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1992
    3047 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990), , , and held that Arizona’s capital sentencing scheme is constitutional.
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
    3047, 3054-56 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990), aff'g
  • State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991