Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Atwood, 832 P.2d 593.

512 citing documents.

State v. Maturana 882 P.2d 933 Ariz. 1994
State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994
State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994
State v. Lara 880 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
State v. Lara 880 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, , cert.
Lee v. Hodge 882 P.2d 408 Ariz. 1994
Lee v. Hodge 882 P.2d 408 Ariz. 1994
3 Boettcher, 854 P.2d *101 at 210 ; , (discussing admissibility of prior acts evidence under rule 404(b) in criminal case, using same factors but defined in terms of evidentiary rules).
State v. Gates 897 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Gates 897 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County 887 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County 887 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
see also In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-123196
State v. Cornell 878 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1994
State v. Cornell 878 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1994
State v. Hummert 905 P.2d 493 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Hummert 905 P.2d 493 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Poundstone 880 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Poundstone 880 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
State v. Evans 866 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1994
State v. Fodor 880 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Fodor 880 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Viewed in a light most favorable to sustaining the jury verdicts, , cert.
State v. Sasak 871 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Sasak 871 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
We have rejected this argument before: -401 , -1255 (1993); -59 , -76 (1992), cert.
State v. Romero 870 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Romero 870 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
(finding that even where the defendant had changed his goals and behavior in prison, that was not enough to find that the defendant was a model prisoner and was therefore not a mitigating circumstance), cert.
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
1417, 1419-20 , 10 L.Ed.2d 663 (1963); , cert.
State v. Cruz 857 P.2d 1249 Ariz. 1993
State v. Cruz 857 P.2d 1249 Ariz. 1993
See Atwood, -59 , -76 (1992), cert.
State v. Andersen 868 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Andersen 868 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Puls 860 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
State v. Puls 860 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
State v. Lang 862 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Lang 862 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Martinez 854 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Martinez 854 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(reversible error to bolster victim’s credibility with victim’s religious devotion) -11 , -28 (1992), cert.
State v. Serna 857 P.2d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Serna 857 P.2d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Runningeagle 859 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1993
State v. Runningeagle 859 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1993
we also look at such factors as a defendant’s intelligence and past experience to determine whether age is a mitigating circumstance.” -54 , -70 (1992), cert.
State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
State v. Duzan 862 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Duzan 862 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993