Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Atwood, 832 P.2d 593.

512 citing documents.

State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
State v. Strayhand 911 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Strayhand 911 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
2044 , 114 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991) (state has burden of proving confessions voluntary); , (standard of review is for clear and manifest error); , cert.
State v. Levato 905 P.2d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Levato 905 P.2d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Salazar 898 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Salazar 898 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Johnson 905 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Johnson 905 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Tarango 895 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Tarango 895 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Barr 904 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Barr 904 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Robles 895 P.2d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Robles 895 P.2d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
975 (D.N.J.1994), aff 'd in part and vacated in part on other grounds, 40 F.3d 1384 (3d Cir.1994); , cert.
State v. Moore 901 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Moore 901 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Ekmanis 901 P.2d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Ekmanis 901 P.2d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Sanderson 898 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Sanderson 898 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Cid 892 P.2d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Barreras 892 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1995
State v. Willoughby 892 P.2d 1319 Ariz. 1995
State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
State v. Barreras 892 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1995
645 n. 21, , 662 n. 21 (1992), cert.
State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
State v. Willoughby 892 P.2d 1319 Ariz. 1995
State v. Cid 892 P.2d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Krone v. Hotham 890 P.2d 1149 Ariz. 1995
Krone v. Hotham 890 P.2d 1149 Ariz. 1995
State v. Hinchey 890 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1995
State v. Hinchey 890 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1995
State v. Valdez 894 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Valdez 894 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
We recently stated that “[i]f [a] defendant [can] demonstrate that media coverage was so extensive or outrageous that it permeated the proceedings or created a ‘carnival-like’ atmosphere, we would presume prejudice without a particularized examination of the publicity’s effect on the jury.”
State v. Kiper 887 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Kiper 887 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Maturana 882 P.2d 933 Ariz. 1994