Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Atwood, 832 P.2d 593.

512 citing documents.

State v. Rodriguez 921 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1996
P. 20 “Substantial evidence” is “evidence that would convince an unprejudiced thinking mind of the truth of the fact to which the evidence is presented.” , cert.
State v. Towery 920 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1996
State v. Towery 920 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1996
State v. Tovar 930 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Tovar 930 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Miller 928 P.2d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Miller 928 P.2d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
We rejected the argument that the death penalty is unconstitutional because the judge, rather than the jury, , , cert.
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See, e.g., Gulbrandson, 184 Ariz. at 60-61 , 906 P.2d at 593-94 ; , , , 473 n. 2, , 233 n. 2 (App.1993).
State v. Superior Court 920 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Paxton 925 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Paxton 925 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Superior Court 920 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Jackson 924 P.2d 494 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Jackson 924 P.2d 494 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Denman 923 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Denman 923 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Grainge 918 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Grainge 918 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. McCoy 928 P.2d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
State v. McCoy 928 P.2d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdict, , cert.
State v. Roscoe 910 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1996
State v. Roscoe 910 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
(finding that 28 is not a young age), cert.
State v. McMurry 909 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. McMurry 909 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Pecina 908 P.2d 52 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Pecina 908 P.2d 52 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Bogan 905 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Bogan 905 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Hardwick 905 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Hardwick 905 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
State v. Walker 914 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Walker 914 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
1496, 1502, 99 L.Ed.2d 771 (1988); State v. *61 Atwood, , , cert.
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Walden 905 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1995
State v. Walden 905 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1995
that the verdict would have been different had the jury been properly instructed.” , cert.
State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995