Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Stanley, 809 P.2d 944.
- State v. Smith 974 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1999
- State v. Soto 990 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- State v. Soto 990 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
- State v. Pettit 979 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
State v. Pettit
979 P.2d 5
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
“Factors indicative of custody include: (1) whether the objective indicia of arrest are present, (2) the site of the interrogation, (3) the length and form of the investigation, and (4) whether the investigation had focused on the accused.” , , cert.
-
State v. Greene
967 P.2d 106
Ariz. 1998
¶ 55 We have found mitigation where the defendant was an adequate family member, , but refused to find mitigation where the defendant had maintained minimal contact with his child.
- State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
-
State v. Rienhardt
951 P.2d 454
Ariz. 1997
we may consider six factors in determining whether a murder was especially heinous or depraved.
- State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Weinstein 947 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
- State v. Weinstein 947 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
- State v. Jones 937 P.2d 310 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Jones 937 P.2d 310 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Rodriguez 921 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Rodriguez 921 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. Lee
917 P.2d 692
Ariz. 1996
See Rule 10.3(b), Ariz.R.Crim.P.; , , cert.
- State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Miles 918 P.2d 1028 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Killean 907 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Killean 907 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Strayhand 911 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Stokley 898 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1995
-
State v. Stokley
898 P.2d 454
Ariz. 1995
igned to still the unconscious bodies and assuage the killers’ discomfort from the reflexes of death.” The court concluded, “The manner of killing and disposition of the bodies demonstrate an obdurate disregard for human life and human remains.” “The killing of a helpless child is senseless and demonstrates a disregard for human life satisfying two of the five Gretzler factors.” , , cert.
- State v. Barreras 892 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Barreras 892 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
-
State v. Ross
886 P.2d 1354
Ariz. 1994
(one-and-a-half hour to two-hour interview not extraordinary), cert.
- State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
- State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Scott 865 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Scott 865 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
- State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
- State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Ayala 873 P.2d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
- State v. Ayala 873 P.2d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
- State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Lang 862 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993