Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Stanley, 809 P.2d 944.
- State v. Lang 862 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Kiles 857 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Schurz
859 P.2d 156
Ariz. 1993
Instead, -31 , -56 , cert.
-
State v. Kiles
857 P.2d 1212
Ariz. 1993
3047, 3058 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990) (“[W]e have just concluded that the challenged factor [of heinous, cruel or depraved] has been construed by the Arizona courts in a manner that furnishes sufficient guidance to the sentencer.”); , (“The United States Supreme Court has specifically found that our construction of these aggravating factors [heinous, cruel or depraved] meets constitutional requirements.”), cer t. denied, — U.S.—, 112 S.Ct.
- State v. Hamilton 840 P.2d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Hamilton 840 P.2d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
- State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
- State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991