Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mathers, 796 P.2d 866.
- State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Williams
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
West, 226 Ariz. at 562, ¶ 16 ().
- State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
-
State v. Dansdill
443 P.3d 990
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
¶ 16 (quoting State v. Mathers , , 66, , 868 (1990) ).
- State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Bernal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Bernal
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 16 (2011) ().
- State v. Wesley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Wesley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Duarte 438 P.3d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
- State v. Donaldson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Duarte
438 P.3d 707
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
" State v. Sharma , , ¶ 7, (quoting State v. Mathers , , 67, , 869 (1990) ).
-
State v. Donaldson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla and is such proof that ‘reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of [the] defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” (citation omitted).
- State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Tamala
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶25 Sufficient evidence may be direct or circumstantial and “‘is such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate’” to “‘support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” ¶¶ 9, 11 (App. 2013) ().
- State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Eisenmann
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979)).
- State v. Ponce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Ponce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Ramos
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
West, 226 Ariz. at 562, ¶ 16 ().
- State v. Dutra 426 P.3d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Dutra
426 P.3d 308
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
West, 226 Ariz. at 562, ¶ 16 ().
- State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Allen
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla and is such proof that ‘reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of [a] defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” ().
- State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Ramirez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla and is such proof that ‘reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” ().
- State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Edwards
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Substantial evidence is “such proof that ‘reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” ().
- State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Luna
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
"Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla and is such proof that 'reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'" ().
- State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Carrizoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Carrizoza
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We will not reverse the superior court’s denial unless “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support [the convictions].”
- State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Escalante Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Escalante
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Substantial evidence is such proof that “reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” (citation omitted).
- State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Valdenegro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Washington
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Substantial evidence is such proof “reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” ().
-
State v. Valdenegro
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Substantial evidence is proof that “reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” (citation omitted).
- State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
- State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017