Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jimenez, 799 P.2d 785.
- State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Bible
858 P.2d 1152
Ariz. 1993
41 To properly find cruelty, the State “must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was conscious and suffered pain or distress at the time of the offense.”
- State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Hill
848 P.2d 1375
Ariz. 1993
“ 'To support a finding of cruelty, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was conscious and suffered pain or distress at the time of the offense.’ ” Cook, 170 Ariz. at 60 , 821 P.2d at 751 ( , ).
- State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
-
State v. Brewer
826 P.2d 783
Ariz. 1992
See, -59 , -800 (1990) (schizotypal psychotic illness, command hallucinations and voices, borderline intelligence); , (chemical disorder in the brain); , (valium intoxication, neurolog
- State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
-
State v. Cook
821 P.2d 731
Ariz. 1991
“To support a finding of cruelty, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was conscious and suffered pain or distress at the time of the offense.” , ( , cert.
- State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
- State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
- State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990