Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jimenez, 799 P.2d 785.

66 citing documents.

  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
    41 To properly find cruelty, the State “must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was conscious and suffered pain or distress at the time of the offense.”
  • State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
    “ 'To support a finding of cruelty, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was conscious and suffered pain or distress at the time of the offense.’ ” Cook, 170 Ariz. at 60 , 821 P.2d at 751 ( , ).
  • State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
    See, -59 , -800 (1990) (schizotypal psychotic illness, command hallucinations and voices, borderline intelligence); , (chemical disorder in the brain); , (valium intoxication, neurolog
  • State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
    “To support a finding of cruelty, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was conscious and suffered pain or distress at the time of the offense.” , ( , cert.
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990