Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bilke, 781 P.2d 28.

81 citing documents.

State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
–53 (1989); see Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Sills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Sills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 9 (2016) (–53 (1989)).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P. 32.1(e)(2); ¶ 9 (2016) (requiring petitioners to establish, inter alia, they were "diligent in discovering the facts and bringing them to the court's attention" when pursuing a newly-discovered-evidence claim (-53 (1989))); (directing petitioners to raise PCR issues first in the superior court).
State v. Lipsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Lipsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. King 480 P.3d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. King 480 P.3d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(describing the “first requirement” as whether the proffered evidence is newly discovered); Serna, 167 Ariz. at 374; -44 (Wash.
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Larsgard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Larsgard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
P. 32.1(e), 32.2(a)–(b); –53 (1989); ¶ 13 (App. 2000).
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
A defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing regarding a claim of newly discovered evidence if he or she presents a “colorable claim.”
State v. Tucker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Tucker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State of Arizona v. Kevin Artice Miles 414 P.3d 680 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Kevin Artice Miles 414 P.3d 680 Ariz. 2018
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.1(e)(1), (2); -53 (1989).
State v. Torrefranca Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Carson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Carson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.1(e) (stating newly discovered facts must be material); -53, -30 (1989) (providing the requirements for a colorable claim in a newly discovered evidence case); Brady, 373 U.S. at 87 (holding “suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment”
State v. Smiley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Smiley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Smiley argued his recent diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”)
State v. Jenkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Coven Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Coven Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-53, -30 (1989) (presenting requisite factors for a colorable claim in a newly- discovered evidence case).
State v. Salem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Luke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Luke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-53, -30 (1989) (noting the requirements for properly asserting a claim for post-conviction relief based on newly discovered evidence include a showing that (1) the evidence must appear on its face to have existed at the time of trial but be discovered after trial, and (2) the petition must allege fa
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-53, -30 (1989) (citation omitted); accord Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Hargous Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hargous Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Volpe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Volpe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-53, -30 (1989) (citation omitted).
State v. Avington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Avington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Travis Wade Amaral 368 P.3d 925 Ariz. 2016
State v. Travis Wade Amaral 368 P.3d 925 Ariz. 2016
State v. Antrobus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Antrobus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
–53, –30 (1989) (providing the requirements to obtain post-conviction relief based on newly discovered evidence).
State v. McElveen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015