Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Runningeagle, 859 P.2d 169.

119 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Efren Medina 306 P.3d 48 Ariz. 2013
In State v. Runningeagle, we found that the defendant relished the murder when he laughed as he returned to the car after the murder and bragged that “he had been in a ‘good fight.’”
State v. Pete J. Vanwinkle 285 P.3d 308 Ariz. 2012
State v. Pete J. Vanwinkle 285 P.3d 308 Ariz. 2012
VanWinkle shouted that he was “going to throw this motherfucker over the tier.” (finding relishing when defendant laughed and bragged of “good fight” immediately after murder).
State v. Cotten 263 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Cotten 263 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
(defendant’s conduct in committing a burglary “caused the victims to suffer an additional risk beyond that inherent in the killing: one crime presented a risk to property, the other presented a risk to life.”).
State v. Martinez 245 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Martinez 245 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
(describing Gordon as applying a three-part test).
State v. Bearup 211 P.3d 684 Ariz. 2009
State v. Bearup 211 P.3d 684 Ariz. 2009
” joking, and looking forward to media coverage); (bragging about beating victim shows that defendant relished his crime), overruled on other grounds, n.7, ¶ 30, n.7 (1998); State v. Runningeagle, 176 Ariz. 59, 65, (laughing immediately after murder and bragging to girlfriend constitute relishing); cf. Greene, 192 Ariz. at 441, ¶ 40, 967 P.2d at 116 (noting that bragging may provide “sufficient proof of relishing where the defendant’s statements prov
State v. Bennett 146 P.3d 63 Ariz. 2006
State v. Bennett 146 P.3d 63 Ariz. 2006
9 B. ¶21 A colorable claim is “one that, if the allegations are true, might have changed the outcome.” State v. Runningeagle, 176 Ariz. 59, 63
Canion v. Cole 115 P.3d 1261 Ariz. 2005
Canion v. Cole 115 P.3d 1261 Ariz. 2005
See Carriger, 143 Ariz. at 146, 692 P.2d at 995; - 7 - 63, (defining a colorable claim as one that, if taken as true, might have changed the verdict); (same).
State v. Anderson 111 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2005
State v. Anderson 111 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2005
State of Arizona v. Rodney George Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Rodney George Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
A colorable claim of post-conviction relief is “one that, if the allegations are true, might have cha nged the outcom e.”
State v. Sepahi 61 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State v. Sepahi 61 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Carl W. Morgan, Jr 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Morgan 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Morgan 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Carl W. Morgan, Jr 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Spreitz 39 P.3d 525 Ariz. 2002
State v. Spreitz 39 P.3d 525 Ariz. 2002
State v. Ring 25 P.3d 1139 Ariz. 2001
State v. Ring 25 P.3d 1139 Ariz. 2001
See, e.g., Medina, 193 Ariz. at 514 ¶ 41, 975 P.2d at 104 ¶ 41 (relishing, gratuitous violence, and helplessness); , (helplessness and gratuitous violence); , (helplessness and relishing); , (helplessness and relishing); , (needless mutilation of victim); , (relishing, gratuitous violence, and helplessness)
State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
State v. Greene 967 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1998
See, , , (finding relishing where defendant laughed as he returned to the car after the murder and bragged that he had.
State v. Cornish 968 P.2d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Cornish 968 P.2d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
We now consider that the supreme court has not so constrained us
State v. Lee 959 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1998
State v. Lee 959 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1998
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Trostle 951 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1997
State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
State v. Lacy 929 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1996
State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
State v. Soto-Fong 928 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1996
State v. Winkle 922 P.2d 301 Ariz. 1996
State v. Winkle 922 P.2d 301 Ariz. 1996
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
State v. Gulbrandson 906 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1995
Cf. West, 176 Ariz. at 448 , 862 P.2d at 208 (bragging about beating up “some old man”); , , cert.
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Grannis 900 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1995