Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Dawson, 792 P.2d 741.

221 citing documents.

State v. Ales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Ales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(―In the absence of a timely appeal or cross-appeal by the state seeking to correct an illegally lenient sentence, an appellate court has no subject matter jurisdiction to consider that issue.‖).
State v. Millanes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Beucler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Beucler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Millanes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Duran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Duran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sandoval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sandoval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee Cota 319 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee Cota 319 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(emphasizing appellate court lacks jurisdiction to correct error regarding mandatory restitution, absent appeal or cross-appeal); see also A.R.S.
CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc. v. Maricopa County 244 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc. v. Maricopa County 244 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
The Note explains that “[essentially no issues which could lead to the same practical result as that embodied in the judgment will be foreclosed by lack of a cross-appeal.” 6 Id.; see also State v. Daw *164 son, , (rejecting a claim that, absent an appeal or cross-appeal, the court is “statutorily-conferred with the power to consider any error raised by the state that is not in support of the judgment”); , 177 n. 1, , 1036 n. 1 (App.1998
State of Arizona v. James A. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. James A. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Hatch 239 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Hatch 239 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Botkin 200 P.3d 323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Botkin 200 P.3d 323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(“The trial court’s failure to impose a sentence in conformity with the mandatory provisions of the sentencing statute makes that sentence ‘illegal’ ...
State v. Bryant 200 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Jerry Don Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Jerry Don Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Bryant 200 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission 132 P.3d 1187 Ariz. 2006
Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission 132 P.3d 1187 Ariz. 2006
State v. Viramontes 93 P.3d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Viramontes 93 P.3d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
citing Arizona v. Manypenny, 451 U.S. 232 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Hensley 31 P.3d 848 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
State v. Hensley 31 P.3d 848 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
(“[T]he trial court’s failure to impose a legal sentence is one of those rare situations from which the state can seek review even if it failed to object in the trial court.”); n. 4 , (appellate court’s power to correct illeg
State v. Flannigan 978 P.2d 127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Flannigan 978 P.2d 127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Doss 966 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Doss 966 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Carbajal 907 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Carbajal 907 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Pennington 868 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Pennington 868 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
A. Jurisdiction In State v. Dawson , the Arizona Supreme Court held that an appellate court has no subject matter jurisdiction to consider lenient sentencing where the state does not file a cross-appeal.
State v. Holguin 870 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Holguin 870 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Youngblood 844 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Steffy 839 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Steffy 839 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lee v. Superior Court 840 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992