Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Dawson, 792 P.2d 741.
- Lee v. Superior Court 840 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Rushton 837 P.2d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
State v. Rushton
837 P.2d 1189
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
the majority concluded that, in the absence of a proper appeal or cross-appeal by the state, it had no jurisdiction to correct the illegally lenient sentences.
- State v. Smith 831 P.2d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
State v. Smith
831 P.2d 877
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
(appellate jurisdiction is based on existence of statute conferring right to appeal, timely filing of notice of appeal, and grounds specified in jurisdictional statute).
- State v. Anderson 827 P.2d 1129 Ariz. 1992
-
State v. Anderson
827 P.2d 1129
Ariz. 1992
Defendant, , then argued that the court of appeals had no jurisdiction to remand for resentencing because the state had not cross-appealed.
- State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
-
State v. Brewer
826 P.2d 783
Ariz. 1992
Section 13-4035, for instance, is not so much jurisdictional in nature as it is relevant to our scope of review, requiring us to search the entire record for fundamental error “when a defendant appeals from a judgment, regardless of the grounds urged in that appeal.”
- State v. Anderson 819 P.2d 967 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- State v. Anderson 819 P.2d 967 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- State v. McCuin 808 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- State v. McCuin 808 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- State v. Kinslow 799 P.2d 844 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Kinslow 799 P.2d 844 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Garcia 799 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Garcia 799 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Wilson 796 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Wilson 796 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State Ex Rel. Neely v. Rodriguez 796 P.2d 876 Ariz. 1990
- State Ex Rel. Neely v. Rodriguez 796 P.2d 876 Ariz. 1990