Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Michael Apelt, 861 P.2d 634.
- State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
-
State v. Spreitz
945 P.2d 1260
Ariz. 1997
We have held that a special verdict is not defective because it “does not discuss all the circumstances argued by the defense to be mitigating.” State v. Apelt (Michael), , ( , ).
- Mazen v. Seidel 940 P.2d 923 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Mann 934 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Laird 920 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. Laird
920 P.2d 769
Ariz. 1996
State v. Apelt (Michael), , cert.
- State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. Jones
917 P.2d 200
Ariz. 1996
(victim’s sister’s recommendation of life sentence not relevant mitigating circumstance because recommendation was out of concern for defendant’s family and was unrelated to defendant); , cert.
- State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Grannis 900 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1995
-
State v. Grannis
900 P.2d 1
Ariz. 1995
-67 , -52 (1993), which upheld the denial of a defendant’s request for funds for counsel or an investigator to travel to Germany to look for mitigating evidence in a death case with no adequate showing of necessity.
- State v. Willoughby 892 P.2d 1319 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Willoughby 892 P.2d 1319 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
-
State v. Ross
886 P.2d 1354
Ariz. 1994
§ 13-703(0; State v. Mi *605 chael Apelt, , cert.
- State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
- State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
- State v. Cornell 878 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1994
- State v. Cornell 878 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1994
- State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Rudi Apelt
861 P.2d 654
Ariz. 1993
I. BACKGROUND Most of the facts relevant to this appeal are summarized in the companion case